What This Bill Does
The Stop Secret Spending Act of 2025 would require federal “other transaction agreements” to be reported on USAspending.gov, the government’s public spending website. It amends the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 so these agreements are treated as reportable federal spending, and it directs the Treasury Secretary to make the data automatically available and viewable in a centralized way within 3 years. The bill also requires annual public reports on federal spending that has not been posted, including whether it was classified, tied to national security, or involved certain legislative or judicial branch awards. In addition, it calls for agency-by-agency determinations, inspector general reporting, and a GAO review of related Federal Acquisition Regulation language.
- Adds “other transaction agreements” to the federal spending reporting framework in the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006.
- Requires automatic transmission of other transaction agreement data to USAspending.gov within 3 years of enactment.
- Directs the Treasury Secretary to post an annual report on federal spending that has not been posted to the website, starting within 1 year.
- Requires an initial USAspending.gov report within 1 year if automatic reporting is not yet in place.
- Calls for a GAO review of Federal Acquisition Regulation clause 52.204-10 within 1 year.
Who This Bill Affects
If you are a taxpayer, journalist, watchdog group, contractor, or anyone who uses USAspending.gov, this bill would likely make it easier to see federal spending that is currently harder to track, especially other transaction agreements. It could also mean more complete public reporting within 1 to 3 years, plus annual disclosure of unreported federal spending and why it was not posted. If you are a federal agency, it would add reporting, data-quality, and verification obligations.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Taxpayers and fiscal watchdogs They would likely support the bill because it makes a less-visible category of federal spending easier to track on USAspending.gov. Public reporting can help identify where money is going and whether spending is being omitted for reasons that should be visible to Congress and the public.
- Small businesses and federal contractors Businesses that compete for federal work may favor clearer disclosure because it can improve market visibility and help firms understand where federal funding is flowing. A centralized public record can also make it easier to identify opportunities and compare agency spending patterns.
- Oversight-minded lawmakers and inspectors general They may see the bill as strengthening accountability by requiring regular reports, agency determinations, and inspector general submissions. The bill also gives the Secretary and Director authority to verify whether posted data is complete, accurate, and consistent.
- Federal agencies handling sensitive programs Agencies that use other transaction agreements for fast-moving or sensitive projects may worry that new reporting rules add administrative burden and could complicate how they manage data. They may also be concerned about the practical limits of posting information tied to national security or classified work.
- Defense and national security stakeholders They may argue that some other transaction agreements are used in contexts where disclosure could reveal sensitive details, even if the bill still allows for national security-related or classified exceptions in annual reporting. Their concern would be that broader transparency requirements could create risk or slow down urgent programs.
- Agency IT and procurement staff Staff responsible for data systems may oppose the bill’s implementation deadlines because it requires automatic transmission, centralized display standards, and agency-by-agency determinations. Those requirements could mean new integration work across multiple systems and offices.
Key Implications
-
““data relating to other transaction agreements is automatically transmitted to the website””
This means OT agreement information would not just sit in agency systems; it would have to flow into USAspending.gov automatically. For the public, that should make these awards easier to find and compare across agencies.
-
““a centralized view of the data ... is available on the website””
The bill is not just about posting raw files. It requires a consolidated display, which matters because scattered data can be hard for non-experts to use.
-
““the total amount of Federal spending ... for which data has not been posted””
This creates a public accounting of what is still missing from the transparency website. That could highlight gaps in disclosure and show how much spending remains outside public view.
-
““including whether the Federal spending was— national security-related or classified””
The bill recognizes that some spending may not be publicly posted for security reasons. It still requires those reasons to be identified in the annual report, which adds accountability without forcing disclosure of sensitive details.
-
““the Secretary ... shall publish ... a report that lists ... all other transaction agreements””
If automatic reporting is not yet working after 1 year, the bill still forces an interim public inventory. That gives Congress and the public a fallback disclosure mechanism while the full system is being built.
Latest Status
June 10, 2026
Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2721-2723; text: CR S2722-2723)
Related Bills
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.