What This Bill Does
H.J. Res. 195 is a congressional disapproval resolution that would overturn a Department of Health and Human Services rule titled "Restoring Flexibility in the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF)." If enacted, it would make the rule published on May 12, 2026, at 91 Fed. Reg. 25796, have "no force or effect." The resolution does not create a new child care program or funding stream; it uses the Congressional Review Act process to block an existing federal regulation. Its practical effect would fall on states, child care administrators, providers, and families that would otherwise be subject to the HHS rule.
- Disapproves the HHS rule on "Restoring Flexibility in the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF)".
- Targets the rule published May 12, 2026, at 91 Fed. Reg. 25796.
- If enacted, the rule would have "no force or effect."
- Uses chapter 8 of title 5, the Congressional Review Act process.
- Does not create new funding or a new child care program.
Who This Bill Affects
For a family or provider affected by CCDF, this resolution would matter only if the HHS rule would have changed how the program is run in their state. If the resolution became law, the May 12, 2026 HHS rule would be voided, so any new requirements or flexibilities in that rule would not apply; instead, the prior CCDF framework would remain in place. For the general public, the effect is indirect and centered on child care administration rather than on direct federal payments or taxes.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- State child care administrators They may favor blocking the rule if they believe it would add federal constraints or complicate how states administer CCDF. Keeping the rule from taking effect could preserve existing state practices and reduce compliance changes.
- Child care providers Providers who worry the rule could change participation requirements, reporting, or reimbursement rules may support disapproval. They may prefer stability over a new federal regulatory framework.
- Some working parents receiving subsidies Parents who fear the rule could disrupt local program operations may support stopping it if they think it could create confusion or reduce access during implementation.
- Child care policy advocates They may oppose the resolution because it blocks an HHS rule intended to change CCDF administration, potentially preventing reforms they think would improve the program. They may argue Congress should not erase a finalized rule without replacing it with a clearer statutory alternative.
- State officials seeking more federal flexibility If they view the HHS rule as a way to give states more room to tailor CCDF, they may oppose disapproval because it would freeze the prior framework instead of allowing the new approach to operate.
- Families relying on child care assistance Some families may oppose the resolution if they believe the rule would have improved access, reduced red tape, or made the program easier to use. Voiding the rule could leave existing barriers in place.
Key Implications
-
“"Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Health and Human Services"”
This is the core legal action: Congress would use the review process to cancel a finalized agency rule. In practice, that means the HHS regulation would not govern CCDF operations if the resolution becomes law.
-
“"Restoring Flexibility in the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF)"”
The resolution is aimed at a specific child care subsidy program used by states to help eligible families pay for care. Any policy change in the rule would affect how that program is administered, not whether the program exists.
-
“"published May 12, 2026 (91 Fed. Reg. 25796)"”
The resolution is tied to a specific published rule, which helps identify exactly which HHS action Congress is trying to nullify. That date also shows the resolution is responding to a very recent regulatory change.
-
“"such rule shall have no force or effect"”
If enacted, this language would erase the rule’s legal effect nationwide. States, providers, and families would continue under the prior regulatory regime rather than the new HHS rule.
Latest Status
June 10, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.