What This Bill Does
This bill awards a single Congressional Gold Medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment, collectively, for its service during the Revolutionary War. It directs the Secretary of the Treasury to design and strike the medal, then transfer it to the Rhode Island State Library for display and research. The bill also allows the Mint to make and sell bronze duplicates at a price that covers production costs, with those proceeds returned to the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.
- Awards one Congressional Gold Medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment, collectively.
- Directs the Secretary of the Treasury to strike the medal with suitable emblems and inscriptions.
- Requires the medal to be given to the Rhode Island State Library after the award.
- Allows the Mint to sell bronze duplicates at a price covering production costs.
- Deposits duplicate-medal sale proceeds into the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.
Who This Bill Affects
For most people, this bill has no direct financial or eligibility effect. If you are connected to Rhode Island history, military heritage, or the First Rhode Island Regiment, it creates a formal national honor and a public display item at the Rhode Island State Library. The only federal spending involved is the cost of striking the medal and any related Mint expenses, offset in part by sales of bronze duplicates.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Rhode Island residents and local historians They are likely to support the bill because it formally recognizes a Revolutionary War unit with deep Rhode Island ties. The medal and its display at the Rhode Island State Library create a lasting public acknowledgment of the regiment’s service and sacrifice.
- Military heritage advocates They may argue that Congress should honor units that helped secure American independence, especially one highlighted in the findings as among the first integrated units in American history. The bill preserves that history in a national medal and in a research-accessible public display.
- Descendants and communities connected to the regiment’s soldiers Supporters can point to the bill’s recognition of men of African heritage and Indigenous descent who served despite slavery and later faced re-enslavement and wage disputes. The medal is a symbolic correction that elevates their service in the national memory.
- Fiscal conservatives They may object to using federal minting and administrative resources for a commemorative medal, even if the direct costs are limited. From this view, Congress should avoid spending time and money on symbolic honors when there are larger budget priorities.
- People who prefer Congress to focus on current policy issues They may argue that while the regiment’s history is important, a gold medal does not address present-day needs. The bill’s benefits are historical and ceremonial rather than practical.
- Some taxpayers concerned about federal commemorative programs They may question whether national medals should be reserved for the most exceptional cases, since the bill authorizes a gold medal and duplicate bronze sales tied to federal mint operations. Their concern is less about the amount than about the precedent of repeated commemorative awards.
Key Implications
-
““a single gold medal of appropriate design””
Congress is authorizing one official medal, not a broad grant or program. The practical effect is a ceremonial national honor for the regiment as a whole.
-
““shall be given to the Rhode Island State Library””
The medal is intended for public custody and display in Rhode Island, not private ownership. That makes the honor accessible for education and historical research.
-
““available for display elsewhere””
Congress is signaling that the medal may travel or be shown at other sites connected to the regiment. This can broaden public access to the regiment’s history beyond one location.
-
““sell duplicates in bronze… at a price sufficient to cover the costs thereof””
The Mint may produce replicas, but only to recover expenses such as labor, materials, dies, machinery, and overhead. This limits the bill’s financial exposure while allowing commemorative copies.
-
““charged against the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund””
The bill uses an existing Mint funding mechanism for production costs and sends duplicate-sale proceeds back into that same fund. That means the medal program is handled through Mint finances rather than a new standalone appropriation.
Latest Status
June 11, 2026
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Related Bills
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.