Get started free →
HR 9503 119th Congress · House

Bill Would Rename the Secret Service Uniformed Division as the Secret Service Police

Advocate

Official title: To change the name of the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division to the United States Secret Service Police.

This bill would change the official name of the U.S. Secret Service’s Uniformed Division to the U.S. Secret Service Police. The change would primarily affect the agency itself, its officers, federal signage and documents, and how the unit is identified in law and public communications. It does not create a new program, benefit, or spending initiative; it is a terminology and organizational branding change.

  • Renames the Secret Service Uniformed Division as the United States Secret Service Police.
  • Applies to the Secret Service’s uniformed protective unit, not to a new agency.
  • Changes official terminology, branding, and references in federal law and agency materials.
  • Does not create a new benefit, program, or spending authority.
Public Relevance 5 / 100
Niche Narrow / procedural Broad

For most people, this bill would have no direct day-to-day effect. If you interact with the Secret Service or follow federal law enforcement, you would see the unit referred to as the Secret Service Police instead of the Uniformed Division, but the underlying duties and protections would remain the same. There is no new fee, benefit, eligibility rule, or enforcement power attached to the change.

See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysis
FOR
  • Secret Service officers and leadership Supporters can argue that the new name better reflects the unit’s actual mission: armed protection of federal sites and officials. A clearer title may strengthen public recognition and internal identity.
  • Federal law enforcement professionals Some may favor terminology that aligns the unit with other police and protective services, making its role easier for the public and partner agencies to understand. That can reduce confusion in interagency settings and public communications.
  • Government operations watchers Backers may see the change as a simple modernization of federal nomenclature. They may prefer a term that is more descriptive and consistent with how the unit functions today.
AGAINST
  • Fiscal conservatives Opponents may object to spending any money on rebranding a federal unit for a purely symbolic reason. Even modest administrative updates can be seen as unnecessary when they do not change services or security outcomes.
  • Administrative staff and procurement officials Some may resist because the change would require updates to stationery, signage, digital systems, training materials, and internal references. They may view the effort as a low-priority paperwork burden.
  • Civil-liberties advocates concerned with policing language A few critics may worry that changing the title to “Police” could reinforce a more militarized image of the unit. They might prefer a designation that emphasizes protection rather than police authority.
  • “change the name of the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division”

    This would revise the official legal and administrative name used for the agency’s uniformed protective branch. In practice, that means federal references, internal materials, and public communications would need to be updated.

  • “to the United States Secret Service Police”

    The new title emphasizes law-enforcement and protective functions more directly than the current name. That can affect public perception even if the unit’s actual duties stay the same.

  • “Uniformed Division”

    This is the existing term the bill replaces. The change suggests the division’s current identity may be seen as too generic or less descriptive than a police designation.

BillBoard checks this page against public Congress.gov metadata, then adds plain-English analysis where available.

Bill
HR 9503
Congress
119th Congress
Official title
To change the name of the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division to the United States Secret Service Police.
Policy area
Defense & Military
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. (June 29, 2026)
Last updated
June 30, 2026

June 29, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Take Action

Get more from BillBoard

Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.

Ask AI about this bill

Data sourced from api.congress.gov.

Free to use · No credit card

Understand every bill.
Make your voice count.

BillBoard turns dense U.S. legislation into plain-English summaries, helps you take a stance, and connects you to your representatives — in seconds.