This House bill would make reproductive healthcare more accessible for federal employees and, in related ways, for people covered through federal employment arrangements. It is aimed at the federal workforce, which includes civilian employees across agencies and many of their covered family members. The measure is designed to reduce practical barriers to obtaining reproductive care through the federal government’s employment systems and benefits structure.
What This Bill Does
- Would apply to reproductive healthcare access for federal employees.
- Focuses on the federal government as an employer and benefits administrator.
- Was referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Received an additional referral to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- Has 27 cosponsors in the House.
Who This Bill Affects
If you are a federal employee or covered family member, this bill could make it easier to get reproductive healthcare through your job-linked benefits or workplace systems. The practical effect would be on access and convenience rather than a direct cash payment, but it could still matter if current coverage or procedures create barriers. For most people outside the federal workforce, the bill would not change day-to-day access directly. Its broader effect would be through the federal government’s role as an employer and benefits administrator, not through a nationwide health program.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Federal employees and their families They would likely support the bill because it could reduce barriers to obtaining reproductive healthcare through employer-sponsored coverage and federal workplace systems. Workers often care about whether benefits are actually usable, not just whether they exist on paper.
- Health-care providers serving federal workers Providers may view clearer access rules as a way to reduce delays, confusion, and coverage disputes. More predictable federal employee benefits can make it easier for patients to schedule and complete care.
- Employee-benefits advocates They could argue that a large public employer should set a high standard for accessible, comprehensive coverage. Improving access for federal employees may also encourage better practices in other large employer plans.
- Fiscal conservatives concerned about federal benefit expansion They may object if the bill is seen as expanding obligations under federal employee health benefits or increasing administrative costs. Their concern would be that new access requirements could raise premiums, taxpayer costs, or compliance burdens.
- Anti-abortion advocacy groups They could oppose any measure that makes reproductive healthcare easier to obtain if they believe it expands access to services they object to on moral or policy grounds. Their criticism would likely focus on the scope of the benefit rather than the federal workforce itself.
- Agencies responsible for benefits administration Administrative managers may worry about implementing new rules across large, diverse federal workplace systems. Even well-intended access changes can require plan redesigns, staff training, and coordination across agencies.
Key Implications
-
““ensur[ing] the accessibility of reproductive healthcare for Federal employees””
This language indicates the bill is aimed at making reproductive care easier to obtain through federal employment-related systems. In practice, that can mean fewer access barriers for workers and their covered dependents.
-
““for other purposes””
This phrase usually signals that the measure may include related administrative or technical changes beyond the main access goal. Those additional provisions can affect how agencies implement the policy.
-
““referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform””
Referral to this committee shows the bill is being reviewed through the House process before it can move toward markup or floor consideration. Committee jurisdiction often shapes whether and how a proposal advances.
-
““in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure””
An additional referral means at least some provisions are expected to touch that committee’s area of authority. That can matter for timing because multiple committees may need to act before the bill can move forward.
Official Source & Bill Facts
BillBoard checks this page against public Congress.gov metadata, then adds plain-English analysis where available.
- Bill
- HR 9448
- Congress
- 119th Congress
- Official title
- To ensure the accessibility of reproductive healthcare for Federal employees, and for other purposes.
- Policy area
- Healthcare
- Latest action
- Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. (June 24, 2026)
- Last updated
- June 25, 2026
Latest Status
June 24, 2026
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Related Bills
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.