This bill would establish a federal right to provide reproductive health care services, aiming to protect clinicians, clinics, and supporting staff who deliver care such as abortion and related reproductive services. It is designed to shield providers from legal or administrative interference that could block them from practicing or offering care. The measure would primarily affect patients seeking reproductive care, medical professionals, and the institutions that employ or host them.
What This Bill Does
- Creates a federal right to provide reproductive health care services.
- Aims to protect clinicians, clinics, and staff who deliver that care.
- Could reduce the risk of legal or administrative penalties tied to providing reproductive services.
- May help preserve access to care in places with restrictive state laws.
Who This Bill Affects
For people who provide or seek reproductive health care, this bill could make it easier to deliver and receive services by strengthening legal protection for providers. That may be especially meaningful for clinics and clinicians operating in states with restrictive or contested reproductive health laws, where fear of penalties can limit access even when care is technically available.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Reproductive health providers They would argue that providers need clear federal protection so they can offer lawful care without fear of prosecution, licensing action, or harassment. A stable legal environment helps keep clinics open and services available to patients.
- Patients seeking reproductive care They would say the bill protects access by making it more likely that qualified clinicians will continue offering services, especially in areas where providers have been forced to limit care because of legal threats or uncertainty.
- Public health advocates They would argue that access to reproductive care is a core part of basic health care and that protecting providers can prevent delays, travel burdens, and gaps in treatment for patients.
- Anti-abortion advocates They would argue the bill overrides state laws designed to restrict or regulate abortion and other reproductive services. In their view, it expands federal protection for practices they believe should remain limited or prohibited.
- States' rights advocates They would contend that the measure improperly shifts authority from states to the federal government by protecting providers regardless of state policy choices on reproductive care.
- Some religiously affiliated health institutions They may object that broad provider protections could conflict with conscience-based limits on participation in reproductive services and create pressure on institutions that do not want to offer those procedures.
Key Implications
-
““ensure the right to provide reproductive health care services””
This suggests a federal legal protection for clinicians and clinics that provide reproductive care, which could reduce the risk that state or local actions deter them from practicing.
-
““reproductive health care services””
The phrase is broad and can cover multiple kinds of care connected to pregnancy, fertility, contraception, and abortion-related services, depending on how the law defines it.
-
““and for other purposes””
This common legislative language signals that the bill may include related enforcement, definitions, or procedural provisions beyond the main right it creates.
-
“Referred to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Judiciary”
The bill is now in committee review, where members can hold hearings, debate scope, and decide whether to advance it or leave it stalled.
Official Source & Bill Facts
BillBoard checks this page against public Congress.gov metadata, then adds plain-English analysis where available.
- Bill
- HR 9445
- Congress
- 119th Congress
- Official title
- To ensure the right to provide reproductive health care services, and for other purposes.
- Policy area
- Healthcare
- Latest action
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. (June 24, 2026)
- Last updated
- June 25, 2026
Latest Status
June 24, 2026
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Related Bills
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.