What This Bill Does
The Heat Emergency Assessment and Tracking using AI Act would direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to run a Heat Illness AI Surveillance and Response Program and award grants to 3 to 5 eligible entities. Those grants would support AI tools that scan medical records, death certificates, coroner reports, weather data, and occupational information to find heat-related illness and deaths that current systems may miss. The bill authorizes $25 million per year from fiscal years 2027 through 2031. It also requires CDC national guidelines on documenting heat illness and a final report to Congress by September 30, 2031.
- Creates a Heat Illness AI Surveillance and Response Program run by HHS.
- Authorizes $25 million per year for fiscal years 2027 through 2031.
- Requires grants to 3 to 5 eligible entities, including at least one urban and one rural community.
- Directs CDC to issue national guidelines on heat-illness documentation within 2 years.
- Requires a final report to Congress by September 30, 2031.
Who This Bill Affects
For most people, this bill would not change benefits or taxes directly, but it could improve how heat illness is detected and responded to in hospitals and public health systems. If you live in a place with extreme heat, work outdoors, or are treated in a participating health system, the bill could lead to earlier identification of heat-related illness, better local response protocols, and more public outreach about warning signs and prevention. The main practical effect is through the $25 million annual grant program and CDC reporting guidelines, not through direct payments to individuals.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Public health agencies Supporters would argue the bill helps correct undercounting of heat-related deaths and illnesses by improving surveillance, documentation, and reporting. Better data can help officials target warnings, resources, and prevention efforts before heat waves become deadly.
- Hospitals and academic medical centers These entities may support the grant program because it funds development and testing of AI tools that can analyze records, death certificates, and coroner reports. The bill also provides a structured federal framework for pilot projects and reporting, which can help move promising tools into practice.
- Outdoor workers and community health advocates Groups focused on workers and vulnerable communities may favor the bill because it pairs surveillance with clinician training, heat response protocols, and community outreach. That could improve recognition of heat illness in places where symptoms are often missed or dismissed.
- Privacy advocates Opponents may worry that using AI on medical records, death certificates, and coroner reports could increase the risk of sensitive health-data misuse or overcollection. Even with HIPAA compliance requirements, they may question whether the safeguards are strong enough for large-scale data analysis.
- Civil liberties and algorithmic fairness advocates Some may object to relying on AI models to identify heat-related cases because errors or bias could affect different demographic or geographic populations unevenly. The bill anticipates this concern with an advisory board, but critics may still question model transparency and accountability.
- Budget watchdogs Fiscal skeptics may argue that authorizing $25 million annually for five years could be better spent on direct cooling, emergency response, or local public health capacity. They may also question whether a pilot program will produce results that justify broader federal deployment.
Key Implications
-
““make grants to not fewer than 3, and not more than 5, eligible entities””
The program is intentionally limited in size, so only a handful of hospitals, health departments, or research institutions would receive federal funding. That means the bill is designed as a pilot or demonstration effort rather than a nationwide rollout.
-
““$25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2031””
This sets a five-year funding authorization totaling up to $125 million if fully appropriated each year. The money would support AI development, implementation, training, outreach, and related program administration.
-
““an AI advisory board to ensure transparency, community input, fairness, accuracy””
The bill recognizes that AI used in health surveillance can create trust and bias concerns. The advisory board is meant to reduce those risks, especially if models perform differently across demographic or geographic groups.
-
““issue national guidelines to standardize documentation and reporting””
CDC would be tasked with making heat-illness reporting more consistent across states and providers. That could improve national statistics and make it easier to compare heat impacts across regions and over time.
-
““advise Federal department and agencies on broadly deploying AI technologies””
The bill is not limited to a one-off study; it is designed to inform wider federal use of AI for heat tracking. If the pilot works, it could shape future public health surveillance practices beyond the initial grant recipients.
Latest Status
June 11, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Related Bills
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.