The Protect Economic and Academic Freedom Act of 2025 would add new eligibility conditions for colleges and universities that receive federal higher-education funds. Under new Section 124 of the Higher Education Act, institutions participating in Title IV aid programs would have to certify each year that they will not engage in a “nonexpressive commercial boycott” of a major strategic partner of the United States, a category the bill defines to include countries listed in Public Law 113-296 section 4 and entities licensed or organized under their laws. The bill would also require institutions seeking Title VI funds to certify that they do not unreasonably obstruct students and faculty from participating in academic programs in such countries, including study abroad, conferences, exchanges, and joint research. Institutions that miss the certification deadline could lose eligibility for federal funds under these titles.
What This Bill Does
- Annual certification required by July 31 for Title IV schools.
- Covers a “nonexpressive commercial boycott” of a major strategic partner.
- Title VI schools must certify equal access to academic programs in covered countries.
- Missed Title VI certification can make an institution ineligible for Title VI funds in the next fiscal year.
- Secretary must publish a list of schools that fail to certify within 7 business days after July 31.
Who This Bill Affects
If you are a student, faculty member, or administrator at a college that receives federal higher-education aid, this bill could change how your institution handles boycotts and international academic programs. Schools would have to make annual certifications by July 31 to keep Title IV and, in some cases, Title VI eligibility, and they could face loss of federal funds if they do not comply. For people studying, teaching, or doing research connected to Israel or another covered major strategic partner, the bill could make those opportunities more protected at the institutional level, while also limiting a college’s ability to adopt boycott-based policies.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- College administrators seeking clear federal rules They may favor a uniform certification standard because it removes uncertainty about whether boycott-related policies could jeopardize federal aid. Supporters can argue that the bill creates predictable conditions for participation in Title IV and Title VI programs.
- Students and faculty who want access to Israel-linked academic programs They may support the bill because it requires institutions to permit participation in conferences, exchanges, study abroad, and joint research in a major strategic partner on the same terms as other countries. That could reduce barriers to academic mobility and international collaboration.
- Pro-Israel constituencies and foreign-policy hawks They are likely to argue that federal education dollars should not subsidize institutional boycotts against a key U.S. partner. The bill also frames expanded cooperation as serving U.S. “security, stability, and economic vitality.”
- University legal and compliance officers They may oppose the bill because it adds annual certification duties and creates funding risk if an institution’s policies are interpreted as a covered boycott or obstruction. Colleges could face pressure to police procurement, partnerships, and campus policy more aggressively.
- Academic freedom advocates They may argue the bill turns federal funding into a tool to influence institutional political and expressive choices. Even though the bill focuses on “commercial” conduct, opponents could see it as blurring the line between business decisions and protected institutional viewpoints.
- Student and faculty activists who support boycotts or campaign-related restrictions They may object that the bill penalizes institutions for declining commercial relationships tied to foreign policy disputes. They could also argue that conditioning funds on access to programs in one category of countries interferes with university autonomy.
Key Implications
-
““Not later than July 31 of each year... shall certify””
Colleges would have to file a recurring annual certification to keep eligibility, so compliance is not one-time. Missing the deadline itself can create funding consequences even before any substantive review of conduct.
-
““will not engage in a nonexpressive commercial boycott””
The bill targets commercial conduct such as refusing to deal or ending business activities when done to limit relations and not based on a valid business reason. That could affect procurement, partnerships, and vendor decisions at covered institutions.
-
““participate in academic programs... in the same manner””
Institutions would need to treat Israel or another covered major strategic partner like other foreign destinations for study abroad, exchanges, conferences, and joint research. The requirement is aimed at equal access rather than a specific spending level.
-
““be ineligible to receive any funds under this title””
For Title VI programs, missing the certification does not just trigger a warning; it can cut off federal funding for the first fiscal year after the missed deadline. That is a direct financial penalty for noncompliance.
-
““make publicly available... a list of all institutions””
The Department of Education would have to publish which schools failed to certify within 7 business days after July 31. Public listing can add reputational pressure on top of the funding consequences.
Official Source & Bill Facts
BillBoard checks this page against public Congress.gov metadata, then adds plain-English analysis where available.
- Bill
- HR 4795
- Congress
- 119th Congress
- Official title
- Protect Economic and Academic Freedom Act of 2025
- Policy area
- Education
- Latest action
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 24 - 9. (June 25, 2026)
- Last updated
- June 26, 2026
Latest Status
June 25, 2026
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 24 - 9.
Related Bills
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.