Get started free →
S 4769 119th Congress · Senate

Bill to Double Civil Penalties for Unauthorized Entry and Illegal Hiring

Advocate

Official title: A bill to double the civil penalties for aliens who enter or attempt to enter the United States without authorization, aliens subject to a final order of removal who fail or refuse to depart from the United States, and employers that knowingly hire aliens who are not authorized to work in the United States.

This Senate bill would double civil penalties for people who enter or try to enter the United States without authorization, for people under a final order of removal who do not leave, and for employers who knowingly hire workers not authorized to work in the United States. It targets both immigration violations and the job-market incentives that can draw unauthorized migration. The bill’s main mechanism is higher monetary fines, rather than changes to criminal penalties or immigration status rules. It would affect unauthorized migrants, people subject to removal orders, and employers that violate work-authorization rules.

  • Doubles civil penalties for unauthorized entry or attempted entry.
  • Doubles civil penalties for people under a final order of removal who do not depart.
  • Doubles civil penalties for employers who knowingly hire unauthorized workers.
  • Uses higher fines as the main enforcement tool, not new benefit programs or visas.
Public Relevance 28 / 100
Niche Modest scope Broad

If you are an employer, this bill would raise the financial risk of knowingly hiring someone who is not authorized to work, which could mean stricter hiring checks and larger fines for violations. If you are an immigrant subject to removal or someone entering without authorization, the bill would increase the civil penalties tied to those actions. For most other people, the effect would be indirect, through changes in enforcement and hiring practices.

See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysis
FOR
  • Border enforcement advocates They would argue that higher civil penalties create a stronger deterrent against unauthorized entry and ignoring removal orders. In their view, tougher fines help restore respect for immigration laws and reduce repeat violations.
  • Employers that already follow work-authorization rules These employers may support the bill because it penalizes competitors who cut labor costs by hiring unauthorized workers. They may see stronger enforcement as creating a fairer labor market.
  • Workers in industries affected by unauthorized hiring Some workers may support stricter penalties if they believe illegal hiring suppresses wages or undercuts job opportunities. They may view the bill as a way to reduce incentives for employers to bypass legal hiring rules.
AGAINST
  • Immigrant-rights advocates They may argue that higher fines punish vulnerable people without fixing the reasons people migrate or remain in the country. They may also say civil penalties can deepen hardship for families and communities already under strain.
  • Small business owners They may worry that higher penalties increase compliance risk and make hiring more expensive and complicated. Businesses that rely on fast-paced hiring may fear mistakes or paperwork errors could become costlier.
  • Labor and immigrant community groups They may argue that stronger penalties on workers and employers can push employment further underground rather than solve unauthorized labor demand. They may prefer reforms that expand legal work pathways and improve verification systems.
  • “double the civil penalties”

    This means the dollar amount of fines would be increased across the covered violations, making noncompliance more expensive for both individuals and employers.

  • “aliens who enter or attempt to enter the United States without authorization”

    People who cross or try to cross without permission would face higher civil fines, which could add financial consequences on top of existing immigration enforcement.

  • “aliens subject to a final order of removal who fail or refuse to depart”

    People who have already been ordered removed would face steeper penalties if they remain in the country, increasing pressure to comply with removal orders.

  • “employers that knowingly hire aliens who are not authorized to work”

    Businesses that intentionally hire unauthorized workers would face higher fines, which could change hiring practices and increase verification efforts.

June 11, 2026

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Take Action

Get more from BillBoard

Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.

Ask AI about this bill

Data sourced from api.congress.gov.

Free to use · No credit card

Understand every bill.
Make your voice count.

BillBoard turns dense U.S. legislation into plain-English summaries, helps you take a stance, and connects you to your representatives — in seconds.