What This Bill Does
This bill would restore criminal penalties for people who charge veterans unauthorized fees for help with claims for benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. It is aimed at protecting veterans from being exploited by unaccredited or dishonest claims preparers who try to profit from benefit applications and appeals. The measure would make it a federal offense to collect prohibited fees in connection with VA benefits claims, reinforcing existing rules that limit who can charge veterans and when. Its practical effect would be to deter abusive fee practices and give federal authorities another tool to punish bad actors.
- Restores criminal penalties for unauthorized fees tied to VA benefits claims.
- Applies to claims for benefits administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
- Targets people who charge veterans for prohibited claims assistance.
- Aims to deter unaccredited or predatory fee-charging practices.
Who This Bill Affects
For veterans and their families, this bill would add another layer of protection against being charged unauthorized fees when seeking VA benefits. If you are a veteran using a claims helper, the practical effect is that anyone who tries to take money they are not legally allowed to charge could face criminal penalties, which may make the claims process safer and less exploitative.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Veterans seeking disability or pension benefits Supporters say veterans should not have to pay unauthorized fees to get help with benefits they earned through service. Criminal penalties can deter scammers and keep more of the benefit payment in the veteran’s pocket.
- Veterans service advocates Advocates argue that the VA claims process should remain accessible and not become a market for predatory middlemen. Strong enforcement helps preserve trust in the system and protects vulnerable claimants from being misled.
- Federal consumer-protection and fraud enforcement officials Enforcement supporters see criminal penalties as a necessary tool against repeat offenders who exploit confusing rules. They argue that civil remedies alone may not be enough to stop bad actors from charging prohibited fees.
- Paid claims consultants and other fee-based assistance providers Some providers may argue that the bill could chill legitimate paid help for veterans navigating complex claims. They may worry that broad enforcement could punish borderline conduct or create uncertainty about what services can be billed.
- Small business legal and administrative service firms These firms may contend that criminal penalties are too harsh for fee disputes that could be handled through licensing, civil fines, or administrative enforcement. They may also argue that clearer guidance is needed so compliant businesses are not caught up in enforcement actions.
- Veterans concerned about access to outside help Some veterans may worry that tighter penalties could reduce the availability of paid assistance in hard cases, especially where accredited representation is scarce. Their concern is that fewer service providers could mean longer waits or less personalized help.
Key Implications
-
““reinstate criminal penalties””
This means the bill would make certain unauthorized fee practices punishable as crimes again, not just as regulatory violations. That gives prosecutors a stronger enforcement option against people who profit from prohibited charges.
-
““persons charging veterans unauthorized fees””
The focus is on fee collection, not on the veteran’s eligibility for benefits. The practical effect is to target intermediaries who take money they are not allowed to take from veterans seeking claims help.
-
““claims for benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs””
The rule would apply to VA benefits claims broadly, including common benefit applications and appeals. Veterans using help with those claims would be the main people protected by the measure.
-
““and for other purposes””
This standard legislative phrase signals that the bill may also include related technical or conforming changes. Those additional changes would likely support enforcement or clarify how the penalty provision fits into existing VA law.
Latest Status
June 1, 2026
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.