H.Res. 1388 is a nonbinding House resolution that recognizes the importance of pollinators to U.S. agriculture and ecosystems and expresses support for "National Pollinator Week." It does not create a new program or spend federal money; instead, it calls on Americans to observe the week with ceremonies, conservation, and educational activities. The resolution highlights the role of native bees, butterflies, moths, birds, bats, beetles, and honey bees in crop production, biodiversity, and ecosystem health.
What This Bill Does
- Recognizes pollinators as important to U.S. agriculture and ecosystems.
- Supports "National Pollinator Week" and encourages ceremonies, conservation, and education.
- Cites pollinators as adding more than $18 billion a year to crop production.
- States that more than 70 native pollinator species are federally threatened or endangered.
- Expresses an intent to keep working to conserve native pollinator habitats.
Who This Bill Affects
For a typical member of the general public, this resolution has little direct day-to-day effect because it does not create a new program, benefit, or requirement. Its main impact is indirect: it may encourage conservation awareness around pollinators, which matters most to farmers, gardeners, and communities concerned about biodiversity and food production.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Farmers and agricultural producers They benefit from pollination services that help produce more than 100 crops, and the resolution highlights the economic value of healthy pollinator populations. Supporters can argue that public recognition helps build momentum for conservation that protects yields and farm income.
- Environmental and conservation advocates They see the resolution as a useful way to raise awareness about habitat loss, species decline, and ecosystem health. The text emphasizes threatened species such as the Western monarch butterfly and multiple native bees and skippers.
- Educators and local community groups They may welcome a national observance that encourages conservation and educational activities. The resolution gives schools, gardens, and civic groups a clear theme for outreach without imposing any legal burden.
- Fiscal conservatives and anti-symbolic-spending critics They may view commemorative resolutions as low-value symbolism that does not directly fix habitat loss or species decline. Their concern is that Congress is spending time on statements rather than on enforceable conservation policy.
- Some agricultural producers worried about future regulation Even though the resolution itself is nonbinding, some producers may worry it could be used to justify later restrictions on land use, pesticides, or development in pollinator habitats. They may prefer voluntary, locally tailored approaches instead of federal emphasis.
- Industry groups skeptical of federal environmental messaging They may argue that broad claims about pollinator decline can lead to policy overreach without addressing the specific causes on the ground. Their concern is that symbolic resolutions can create pressure for regulations that affect operations without providing new support.
Key Implications
-
“"more than $18,000,000,000 in revenue to crop production"”
The resolution ties pollinator health directly to farm economics. For growers, that means pollinator decline is presented as a real business risk, not just a wildlife issue.
-
“"more than 70 native pollinator species are listed"”
This signals that pollinator decline already involves many species under federal protection. In practice, that can shape future conservation priorities and agency attention even though this resolution itself does not change the law.
-
“"observe 'National Pollinator Week' with appropriate ceremonies"”
This creates a public-awareness function rather than a legal requirement. Schools, cities, and nonprofits could use the week for events, habitat projects, and education campaigns.
-
“"continue working to conserve native pollinator species"”
This expresses a congressional intent to keep pollinator conservation on the policy agenda. It does not specify funding or mandates, so any concrete action would require later legislation or agency steps.
Outlook
As a House resolution, this measure needs only House approval and is not sent to the President. With no cosponsors and only a recent referral to the House Committee on Agriculture, it is more likely to be considered as a symbolic or commemorative statement than to drive major policy action. It could still be agreed to if House leaders choose to bring it up, but the most common outcome for resolutions like this is limited committee attention or adoption without controversy.
Official Source & Bill Facts
BillBoard checks this page against public Congress.gov metadata, then adds plain-English analysis where available.
- Bill
- HRES 1388
- Congress
- 119th Congress
- Official title
- Recognizing the importance of pollinators to ecosystem health and agriculture in the United States and expressing support for "National Pollinator Week".
- Policy area
- Agriculture
- Latest action
- Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture. (June 24, 2026)
- Last updated
- June 25, 2026
Latest Status
June 24, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Related Bills
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.