Get started free →
HR 9557 119th Congress · House

Let Cities Use CDBG Funds for Disaster Mitigation

Advocate

Official title: To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to allow certain grantees to use Community Development Block Grant amounts for natural disaster mitigation activities, and for other purposes.

This bill would amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 so that certain Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) recipients can use those federal funds for natural disaster mitigation projects. In practice, that would let eligible local and state grantees spend CDBG money on actions meant to reduce future damage from floods, storms, wildfires, and other disasters. The bill mainly affects communities that receive CDBG funding, along with residents and property owners in places facing recurring disaster risk. It does not create a new grant program; it broadens how existing grant dollars can be used.

  • Amends the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974
  • Allows certain CDBG grantees to use funds for natural disaster mitigation
  • Uses existing Community Development Block Grant amounts rather than creating a new grant program
  • Applies to eligible local and state recipients of CDBG funds
  • Aims to support resilience projects that reduce future disaster losses
Public Relevance 24 / 100
Niche Modest scope Broad

If you live in a community that receives CDBG money, this bill could make it easier for local officials to pay for projects that reduce disaster damage before it happens. That could mean safer drainage, stronger public facilities, or other resilience work financed with existing federal grant dollars rather than separate local revenue. If your area is not a CDBG grantee or does not face major disaster risk, the direct effect on you would be limited.

See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysis
FOR
  • Local governments in disaster-prone areas They can use existing federal block grant money to strengthen roads, drainage, housing stock, and public buildings before the next storm or wildfire hits. That flexibility can help communities lower long-term recovery costs.
  • Housing and community development officials CDBG funds are already designed for neighborhood-level investments, so allowing mitigation projects can make those dollars more responsive to local needs. Officials may see it as a practical way to pair development with resilience.
  • Residents in flood- and fire-prone neighborhoods People living in areas that face repeated disasters often benefit when communities can pay for prevention instead of only paying for repairs after damage occurs. Mitigation can reduce displacement, property loss, and service disruptions.
AGAINST
  • Community organizations focused on housing and services They may worry that expanding mitigation eligibility will divert CDBG money away from housing rehabilitation, public services, or anti-blight projects. In communities with tight budgets, every new eligible use can increase competition for funds.
  • Small local governments with many unmet needs Cities and counties often have more repair and service priorities than available grant money. They may argue that Congress should provide separate mitigation funding rather than stretching an existing program thinner.
  • Fiscal watchdogs Some may question whether broadening allowable uses of an older grant program creates unclear priorities or encourages spending without enough oversight. They could prefer more targeted disaster-resilience grants with tighter performance rules.
  • “use Community Development Block Grant amounts for natural disaster mitigation activities”

    This is the core change: eligible grantees could spend CDBG funds on prevention and resilience measures, not just traditional community development uses. That could shift local planning toward projects meant to reduce future disaster losses.

  • “certain grantees”

    The authority would not apply to every recipient in the same way. Eligibility limits matter because they determine which states, cities, or counties can redirect grant funds toward mitigation work.

  • “Housing and Community Development Act of 1974”

    The bill would amend an existing federal framework rather than create a new standalone program. That typically means communities would work within familiar grant structures, reporting rules, and administrative systems.

  • “and for other purposes”

    This standard legislative phrase leaves room for additional technical changes that support the main funding flexibility. In practice, it signals that the bill may also adjust related definitions or program rules.

BillBoard checks this page against public Congress.gov metadata, then adds plain-English analysis where available.

Bill
HR 9557
Congress
119th Congress
Official title
To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to allow certain grantees to use Community Development Block Grant amounts for natural disaster mitigation activities, and for other purposes.
Policy area
Housing & Infrastructure
Latest action
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. (June 30, 2026)
Last updated
July 1, 2026

June 30, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Take Action

Get more from BillBoard

Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.

Ask AI about this bill

Data sourced from api.congress.gov.

Free to use · No credit card

Understand every bill.
Make your voice count.

BillBoard turns dense U.S. legislation into plain-English summaries, helps you take a stance, and connects you to your representatives — in seconds.