Get started free →
HR 9473 119th Congress · House

Gold Medal for WWII Pacific POWs

Advocate

Official title: To award a Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to the individuals who fought for or with the United States against the armed forces of Imperial Japan in the Pacific theater and became prisoners of war from December 8, 1941, to August 15, 1945.

This bill would award a Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to U.S. service members and other individuals who fought against Imperial Japan in the Pacific theater and were taken prisoner of war between December 8, 1941, and August 15, 1945. The medal is a ceremonial honor, not a cash benefit, and would be granted to the group as a whole rather than to a single recipient. Its purpose is to recognize extraordinary wartime sacrifice and imprisonment during World War II. If enacted, it would direct Congress to create and present a commemorative medal honoring this specific cohort.

  • Awards a Congressional Gold Medal to Pacific theater POWs from Dec. 8, 1941 to Aug. 15, 1945
  • Applies to people who fought for or with the United States against Imperial Japan
  • Creates a collective honor rather than an individual cash benefit
  • Referred to the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on House Administration
  • Has 58 cosponsors
Public Relevance 10 / 100
Niche Narrow / procedural Broad

For most people, this bill has little direct practical effect. If enacted, it would mainly provide a formal federal honor for surviving former prisoners of war and the families of those who served or died in the Pacific theater, rather than changing taxes, benefits, or eligibility rules. The concrete effect is the creation and presentation of a commemorative Congressional Gold Medal at federal expense.

See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysis
FOR
  • World War II veterans and former POW families They see the medal as long-overdue public recognition of extreme sacrifice, captivity, and survival. A national honor can preserve their service in the historical record and provide a measure of dignity for families.
  • Military history advocates They argue Congress should formally commemorate the generation that fought in the Pacific and endured prison camps. The medal helps educate the public and keeps wartime memory alive as surviving witnesses become fewer.
  • Constituents who favor veteran recognition They support symbolic honors that do not create a new entitlement but still show national gratitude. In their view, the federal government should use its ceremonial powers to recognize extraordinary service.
AGAINST
  • Fiscal conservatives They may question whether Congress should spend money on commemorative medals when the honor does not directly improve veterans’ health care, housing, or survivor support. Their concern is not the recognition itself but the use of federal resources for ceremony.
  • Taxpayer watchdog groups They may view repeated one-off medals as a lower-priority congressional activity. From their perspective, symbolic awards can multiply without clear limits, creating administrative and minting costs for limited practical benefit.
  • Some veterans focused on benefits delivery They may prefer Congress to focus on fixing existing veteran services rather than creating new honors. Their argument is that recognition is meaningful, but should not substitute for material support.
  • “award a Congressional Gold Medal, collectively”

    This means the honor is directed to a defined group rather than one person. The medal is ceremonial and intended to recognize shared sacrifice across a cohort.

  • “individuals who fought for or with the United States against the armed forces of Imperial Japan”

    The recognition extends beyond a narrow service label and includes people who supported the U.S. war effort in the Pacific. That can encompass a broader set of wartime participants who met the bill’s criteria.

  • “became prisoners of war from December 8, 1941, to August 15, 1945”

    The bill ties eligibility to a specific wartime period, which limits the honor to people captured during the Pacific War after Pearl Harbor and before Japan’s surrender.

  • “Congressional Gold Medal”

    A Congressional Gold Medal is one of the most prominent honors Congress can bestow. In practical terms, it creates a federal tribute rather than a benefit program or policy change.

BillBoard checks this page against public Congress.gov metadata, then adds plain-English analysis where available.

Bill
HR 9473
Congress
119th Congress
Official title
To award a Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to the individuals who fought for or with the United States against the armed forces of Imperial Japan in the Pacific theater and became prisoners of war from December 8, 1941, to August 15, 1945.
Policy area
Defense & Military
Latest action
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. (June 25, 2026)
Last updated
June 26, 2026

June 25, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Take Action

Get more from BillBoard

Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.

Ask AI about this bill

Data sourced from api.congress.gov.

Free to use · No credit card

Understand every bill.
Make your voice count.

BillBoard turns dense U.S. legislation into plain-English summaries, helps you take a stance, and connects you to your representatives — in seconds.