The Diversity Visa Protection and Modernization Act would limit the State Department or Homeland Security from suspending the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program as a whole. It allows only narrow country-specific or regional restrictions, case-by-case screening decisions, or a temporary program suspension lasting no more than 60 days. The bill would also require advance notice to Congress and public disclosure in the Federal Register before certain restrictions take effect. It mainly affects Diversity Visa applicants, selectees, and the agencies that administer and screen immigrant visas.
What This Bill Does
- Bars the Secretary of State or Homeland Security from suspending Diversity Visa issuance program-wide.
- Allows only country-specific, regional, or case-by-case limits under section 203(c) of the INA.
- Permits a temporary suspension of no more than 60 days, with automatic resumption after 60 days.
- Requires 7 days' notice to Congress before certain restrictions and publication in the Federal Register.
- Protects selectees from losing eligibility because of a temporary suspension under subsection (b)(3).
Who This Bill Affects
If you are a Diversity Visa applicant or selectee, this bill would make it harder for the government to shut down the program across the board and could protect you from losing eligibility because of a temporary pause of up to 60 days. It would also require advance notice and public transparency for broader country-specific or regional restrictions, which could reduce sudden disruptions in visa processing. If you are not part of the Diversity Visa process, the bill likely has little direct effect on you.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Diversity Visa applicants and selectees They would gain protection against sudden, broad shutdowns that can erase a lawful immigration opportunity after being selected. The bill also makes the process more predictable by requiring notice and a clear end date for temporary suspensions.
- Immigration attorneys and advocates for due process They would likely support the bill’s transparency requirements and its distinction between targeted screening and wholesale suspension. The notice provisions create a record of why restrictions were imposed and when normal processing should resume.
- Employers and families waiting on approved immigrants People relying on Diversity Visa entrants for family reunification or workforce needs may favor fewer opaque delays. The bill could reduce uncertainty caused by indefinite pauses and better preserve valid visa opportunities.
- Executive branch national security and diplomatic officials They may argue the bill limits flexibility to respond to urgent security or foreign-policy developments. A hard 60-day cap and advance notice requirement could make it harder to quickly pause processing when conditions change rapidly.
- Immigration restriction advocates They may object that the bill constrains the government’s ability to use broad pauses as a screening tool. From their perspective, stronger executive discretion is needed to prevent inadmissible or high-risk entries.
- Agencies managing visa backlogs and screening Officials may see the notice, reporting, and publication requirements as adding procedural burdens. Those rules could slow implementation of legitimate country-specific or regional restrictions and create administrative complexity.
Key Implications
-
““may not suspend, pause, or stop the issuance of visas””
This is the bill’s central limit on broad executive action. It means a government-wide halt to Diversity Visa processing would generally be barred unless it fits one of the bill’s specific exceptions.
-
““a limited period not exceeding 60 days””
Temporary shutdowns are still allowed, but only for a short period. After 60 days, visa issuance must automatically resume, which reduces the chance of indefinite administrative pauses.
-
““Not later than 7 days before initiating””
Before certain country-specific or regional restrictions begin, Congress must get advance notice. That creates oversight and gives lawmakers time to react before people’s cases are affected.
-
““published in the Federal Register””
The public would be able to see major restrictions, not just Congress. For affected applicants, that means more transparency about why processing is slowing or stopping.
-
““shall not lose eligibility””
This protects selectees from being penalized solely because of a short suspension. It is especially important for people facing strict visa deadlines and limited annual availability under the Diversity Visa program.
Official Source & Bill Facts
BillBoard checks this page against public Congress.gov metadata, then adds plain-English analysis where available.
- Bill
- HR 9457
- Congress
- 119th Congress
- Official title
- Diversity Visa Protection and Modernization Act
- Policy area
- Immigration
- Latest action
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. (June 25, 2026)
- Last updated
- June 26, 2026
Latest Status
June 25, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Related Bills
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.