The Affordable Youth Enrichment Opportunities Act would add a new federal income tax deduction for certain out-of-pocket costs parents pay for youth programs. Families could deduct up to $5,000 a year for qualified expenses tied to a dependent under age 19, including tutoring, academic enrichment, athletics, arts programs, equipment, training, digital platforms, and related fees. The deduction would phase out entirely for taxpayers above certain income levels: $200,000 for joint filers and surviving spouses, $150,000 for heads of household, and $100,000 for other filers. It would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026.
What This Bill Does
- Creates a new deduction for qualified youth program expenditures in new IRC section 222.
- Caps the deduction at $5,000 per taxable year.
- Phases out the deduction above $200,000 for joint filers, $150,000 for heads of household, and $100,000 for other filers.
- Applies only to expenses for a dependent under age 19.
- Applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026.
Who This Bill Affects
For a typical family with a dependent under 19, this bill could reduce federal taxes by allowing up to $5,000 in annual deductions for qualifying youth expenses such as tutoring, sports, arts instruction, equipment, training, digital platforms, and related fees. The biggest benefit would go to households with enough taxable income to use the deduction and incomes below the bill’s limits of $200,000 for joint filers, $150,000 for heads of household, and $100,000 for other filers. Families above those thresholds would get no deduction, and the same expense cannot be deducted twice.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Parents paying for tutoring, sports, or arts programs They would see direct federal tax relief for costs that can add up quickly, especially when a child participates in multiple activities or needs academic support. The deduction could make enrichment opportunities more financially manageable.
- Families trying to expand access to youth enrichment Supporters may argue the bill encourages participation in programs linked to school success, physical activity, and arts development. By reducing after-tax costs, it could help more children stay involved in structured activities.
- Youth program providers Tutoring centers, sports leagues, and arts instructors may benefit if the tax break encourages more families to enroll children or buy needed equipment and fees. That could increase demand for their services.
- Tax policy analysts concerned about complexity They may argue the bill adds another targeted deduction to the tax code, increasing compliance and administrative complexity. Families and the IRS would need to track which expenses qualify and whether they were already used for another deduction.
- Fiscal conservatives They could object that the deduction reduces federal revenue while mainly helping households with enough taxable income to claim it. They may prefer broader, simpler child or education tax relief instead of a new category tied to specific activities.
- Families with low or no income tax liability Some households most in need of help may not benefit much if they do not owe enough federal income tax to use the deduction fully. For them, a deduction is less valuable than a refundable credit or direct subsidy.
Key Implications
-
““there shall be allowed as a deduction... qualified youth program expenditures””
This creates a brand-new category of deductible family spending tied specifically to children’s enrichment activities.
-
““shall not exceed $5,000””
The tax benefit is capped, so the bill can offset some costs but not fully cover very expensive programs or multiple children’s activities.
-
““no deduction shall be allowed... if... modified adjusted gross income... exceeds””
Higher-income taxpayers above the stated thresholds get no deduction at all, making the bill targeted rather than universal.
-
““equipment, training, digital platforms, or fees””
The bill is broader than simple tuition; it can cover supporting costs that often make youth programs expensive in practice.
-
““Effective... taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026””
Even if enacted, the deduction would not apply immediately to current-year taxes; it would start with tax years beginning in 2027.
Official Source & Bill Facts
BillBoard checks this page against public Congress.gov metadata, then adds plain-English analysis where available.
- Bill
- HR 9426
- Congress
- 119th Congress
- Official title
- Affordable Youth Enrichment Opportunities Act
- Policy area
- Economy & Finance
- Latest action
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. (June 24, 2026)
- Last updated
- June 25, 2026
Latest Status
June 24, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Related Bills
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.