What This Bill Does
This bill would extend a TSA-related program that lets passengers and their checked property, after being screened on direct flights from certain foreign last-point-of-departure airports, continue on connecting flights in the United States without being screened again. It primarily affects international travelers using participating foreign airports and the airlines and airports that handle their connections. The goal is to reduce duplicate screening, speed up connections, and keep airport security procedures coordinated across borders.
- Extends a program for screened passengers arriving from certain foreign last-point-of-departure airports.
- Allows those passengers and their property to continue on U.S. flights without additional screening.
- Applies to specific international arrivals and connecting domestic flight segments.
- Placed in the House Committee on Homeland Security for review.
Who This Bill Affects
If you are an international traveler who connects through a U.S. airport after arriving from one of the eligible foreign last-point-of-departure airports, this bill would help you avoid being screened again before your next flight. That can save time, reduce missed connections, and make baggage handling smoother for those itineraries. For most other people, the effect is indirect and limited to airport operations and travel logistics.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisOfficial Source & Bill Facts
BillBoard checks this page against public Congress.gov metadata, then adds plain-English analysis where available.
- Bill
- HR 9388
- Congress
- 119th Congress
- Official title
- To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize an extension of a program to permit screened passengers and their property arriving on direct flights or flight segments originating at certain foreign last point of departure airports to continue on additional flights or flight segments originating in the United States without additional screening, and for other purposes.
- Policy area
- Immigration
- Latest action
- Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security. (June 23, 2026)
- Last updated
- June 24, 2026
Who Supports & Opposes This
- International travelers with U.S. connections They benefit from fewer repeated screening steps, shorter connection times, and less risk of missing onward flights. The program makes travel more predictable without changing the security checks done at the initial departure point.
- Airlines and airport operators Reducing redundant screening can ease congestion, improve on-time performance, and simplify transfer operations. That can make hub airports more efficient and reduce disruption for passengers and staff.
- Aviation security officials A trusted-airport framework can focus resources on screening where it matters most while keeping standardized security practices in place. Extending the program preserves a security model that has already been used for eligible routes.
- Security hawks and some aviation watchdogs They may argue that any reduction in repeat screening creates a potential weak point if foreign standards change or are unevenly enforced. Their concern is that convenience could outrun caution.
- Passengers who do not benefit from the program Travelers on non-eligible routes may see the policy as uneven, since only certain airports and flight paths receive the shortcut. They may question why some passengers get streamlined treatment while others do not.
- Airport screening contractors and related vendors Fewer re-screening events could reduce demand for some checkpoint staffing and screening services at connecting airports. Any operational efficiency can shift work away from downstream screening facilities.
Key Implications
-
““authorize an extension of a program””
This means Congress would keep the existing screening arrangement available beyond its current end date, rather than letting it lapse. For eligible travelers, the practical result is continued access to a faster connection process.
-
““screened passengers and their property””
The bill is not just about people moving through the airport; it also covers checked or accompanying belongings. That matters because duplicate baggage screening can create delays and handling complications.
-
““continue on additional flights… without additional screening””
This is the core operational change: once the passenger is screened at the foreign departure point, the U.S. connection does not trigger a second round of screening. The benefit is less time at the airport, but the system depends on trusted screening standards at the origin airport.
-
““certain foreign last point of departure airports””
The program is limited to specific foreign airports that meet U.S. security requirements. That narrows the reach of the bill and means the convenience applies only to selected international routes.
-
““for other purposes””
This standard legislative phrase signals that the bill may also include related administrative or technical provisions tied to the same screening program. In practice, that can affect how the Transportation Security Administration and airlines implement the extension.
Latest Status
June 23, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
Related Bills
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.