Get started free →
HR 9315 119th Congress · House

Bill to Replace “Sheltered Workshop” with “Community Rehabilitation Program”

Advocate

Official title: To amend the Small Business Act, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, title 40, United States Code, and title IV of the Social Security Act to replace the term "sheltered workshop" with "community rehabilitation program", and for other purposes.

This bill would update several federal laws to replace the term “sheltered workshop” with “community rehabilitation program.” The changes would apply across the Small Business Act, the Internal Revenue Code, federal property law in title 40, and title IV of the Social Security Act. Its main effect is to modernize statutory language used in programs connected to disability employment and related federal rules, rather than create a new benefit or tax amount. It would mostly affect agencies, contractors, service providers, and people working in disability employment services.

  • Replaces “sheltered workshop” with “community rehabilitation program” in several federal laws.
  • Amends the Small Business Act and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
  • Updates title 40, United States Code, and title IV of the Social Security Act.
  • Applies to federal programs and legal definitions tied to disability employment services.
Public Relevance 20 / 100
Niche Modest scope Broad

For most people, this bill would not change taxes, benefits, or eligibility directly. If you are a disability employment provider, a federal contractor, or someone using programs described in these laws, the main effect would be updated terminology from “sheltered workshop” to “community rehabilitation program,” along with any paperwork, guidance, or compliance updates that follow. For workers with disabilities, the change is mostly a federal language shift that may reduce stigma and better match how services are described today.

See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysis
FOR
  • Disability advocates They are likely to support the bill because federal law should use language that reflects modern, community-based employment values and avoids terminology many consider outdated or stigmatizing.
  • Community rehabilitation providers These providers benefit from having federal statutes use the same terms they already use in practice, which can reduce confusion and make program references more consistent across agencies.
  • Employers and compliance officers Uniform terminology across multiple statutes can make federal compliance easier by reducing ambiguity in forms, guidance, and contract language.
AGAINST
  • Administrative agencies and regulated entities They may worry that changing terms in multiple statutes requires coordinated updates to regulations, manuals, and forms, creating extra short-term compliance work without changing program outcomes.
  • Fiscal conservatives They could argue that Congress should focus on substantive service expansion rather than terminology changes, especially if the bill does not alter eligibility, funding, or measurable outcomes.
  • Some disability policy critics They may view the bill as cosmetic unless paired with stronger reforms to expand integrated employment and phase out segregated work settings in practice.
  • “replace the term ‘sheltered workshop’ with ‘community rehabilitation program’”

    Federal law would use a different label for certain disability employment settings. That matters because statutory wording shapes agency guidance, program documents, and how participants are described in federal systems.

  • “amend the Small Business Act”

    Any Small Business Act provisions that refer to these programs would be updated to match the new terminology, which could affect how small-business-related federal rules are written and interpreted.

  • “Internal Revenue Code of 1986”

    Tax provisions that reference the old term would be revised, reducing the chance that tax-related rules rely on outdated wording when applied by taxpayers or the IRS.

  • “title IV of the Social Security Act”

    Disability-related benefit and service language in Social Security law would be conformed to the new term, which can affect program administration and official references.

  • “for other purposes”

    This language signals that the bill may also make related conforming changes beyond the terminology swap, typically to keep multiple federal statutes consistent with one another.

June 15, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Small Business, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Take Action

Get more from BillBoard

Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.

Ask AI about this bill

Data sourced from api.congress.gov.

Free to use · No credit card

Understand every bill.
Make your voice count.

BillBoard turns dense U.S. legislation into plain-English summaries, helps you take a stance, and connects you to your representatives — in seconds.