Get started free →
HR 9301 119th Congress · House

Heat and Security Commission Bill

Advocate

Official title: To establish an independent bipartisan National Advisory Commission on Extreme Heat and Global Security to develop short-term and long-term sustainable plans of action to mitigate and adapt to extreme heat and heat-related extreme weather events.

This bill would create an independent, bipartisan National Advisory Commission on Extreme Heat and Global Security. The commission would be charged with developing short-term and long-term sustainable plans to help the United States mitigate and adapt to extreme heat and heat-related extreme weather events. It is aimed at federal policymakers, state and local governments, and sectors that face rising risks from dangerous heat, including public health, infrastructure, agriculture, and national security planning.

  • Creates an independent bipartisan National Advisory Commission on Extreme Heat and Global Security.
  • Directs the commission to develop short-term and long-term sustainable plans of action.
  • Focuses on mitigation and adaptation to extreme heat and heat-related extreme weather events.
  • Includes both domestic resilience and global security considerations.
  • Referred to the House Committees on Energy and Commerce and Foreign Affairs.
Public Relevance 22 / 100
Niche Modest scope Broad

For most people, this bill would not change taxes, benefits, or eligibility right away. Its effect would be indirect: if the commission leads to follow-on legislation or agency action, Americans in hot regions, outdoor workers, seniors, and households without reliable air conditioning could see stronger heat preparedness, better warnings, and more resilience planning over time.

See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysis
FOR
  • Public health advocates They argue extreme heat is already causing preventable illness and deaths, and a national commission can help identify the most effective ways to protect vulnerable people before the next heat wave hits.
  • Emergency managers and local governments They see value in a coordinated federal roadmap that can improve preparedness, warning systems, cooling access, and disaster planning across jurisdictions that currently respond unevenly to heat emergencies.
  • Agricultural and outdoor labor interests They support clearer federal planning because heat affects crop yields, livestock, worker safety, and productivity, and they want recommendations that reduce economic disruption and health risks.
AGAINST
  • Fiscal conservatives They may object to creating another federal commission, arguing that it adds administrative cost and bureaucracy without guaranteeing immediate, measurable results.
  • Skeptics of new climate-related federal initiatives They may view the commission as a vehicle for expanding federal involvement in climate adaptation and worry it could lead to broader regulations or spending commitments later on.
  • Some industry groups facing future compliance costs They may be concerned that the commission’s recommendations could translate into new standards for workplaces, buildings, utilities, or infrastructure that raise operating costs.
  • “independent bipartisan National Advisory Commission”

    This means the panel is intended to be insulated from day-to-day partisan control and to include members from both parties. In practice, that can make its recommendations more credible across administrations, though it does not itself create binding policy.

  • “develop short-term and long-term sustainable plans of action”

    The commission would not just study the problem; it would be expected to produce practical recommendations for both immediate response and longer-range adaptation. Those plans could influence future legislation, agency guidance, and state preparedness efforts.

  • “mitigate and adapt to extreme heat and heat-related extreme weather events”

    The bill treats heat as a hazard that requires both prevention-oriented measures and adaptation measures. That can include public health protections, infrastructure upgrades, and emergency planning for heat waves and related weather stress.

  • “global security”

    This language broadens the issue beyond domestic weather response. It suggests the commission may examine how extreme heat affects military readiness, migration pressures, food and water systems, and international stability.

  • “Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce”

    This referral indicates the bill is being reviewed by the House committee with jurisdiction over public health, energy, and related domestic policy issues. Additional referral to Foreign Affairs signals that the international-security aspects may also be examined.

June 11, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Take Action

Get more from BillBoard

Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.

Ask AI about this bill

Data sourced from api.congress.gov.

Free to use · No credit card

Understand every bill.
Make your voice count.

BillBoard turns dense U.S. legislation into plain-English summaries, helps you take a stance, and connects you to your representatives — in seconds.