Get started free →
HR 9293 119th Congress · House

Bill to Reclassify Recovered Materials Under Federal Waste Law

Advocate

Official title: To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to provide that solid waste shall not include certain recovered materials and recovered resources, and for other purposes.

This bill would amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act so that certain recovered materials and recovered resources are not treated as solid waste under federal law. In practical terms, it would change how some recyclable, reusable, or reclaimed materials are regulated when they are collected and processed for further use. The measure is aimed at businesses, recyclers, manufacturers, and waste-management operations that handle secondary materials. By narrowing what counts as solid waste, it could reduce regulatory burdens and make it easier to move recovered materials back into productive use.

  • Amends the Solid Waste Disposal Act.
  • Excludes certain recovered materials and recovered resources from the definition of solid waste.
  • Affects recycling, reuse, and materials-recovery operations.
  • Would change federal handling rules for secondary materials used again as inputs.
Public Relevance 24 / 100
Niche Modest scope Broad

For most people, this bill would work indirectly by changing how recycling and materials-recovery businesses are regulated. If it lowers compliance costs and makes it easier to reuse industrial byproducts, it could modestly support recycling markets and reduce disposal costs that sometimes get passed on to consumers. The main effects would be felt by companies that handle recovered materials, with possible downstream benefits in waste diversion and resource efficiency.

See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysis
FOR
  • Recycling and materials-recovery companies They would likely support the bill because it can reduce regulatory uncertainty and compliance costs when recovered materials are being processed for reuse rather than disposal. Clearer treatment under federal law can make recycling operations more efficient and commercially viable.
  • Manufacturers that use recycled feedstocks These businesses may favor the bill because it can improve access to secondary raw materials and make supply chains for recycled inputs less cumbersome. That can help lower input costs and support domestic production.
  • Waste-to-resource and circular-economy advocates They would argue that federal law should distinguish between true waste and materials that are being recovered for productive use. Reclassifying those materials can encourage diversion from landfills and support resource conservation.
AGAINST
  • Environmental and public-health advocates They may worry that narrowing the solid-waste definition could weaken oversight of materials that still carry contamination, leakage, or disposal risks. Their concern is that fewer federal controls could increase the chance of improper handling.
  • State and local waste regulators They may be concerned about confusion or gaps between federal and state rules if materials are no longer treated as solid waste at the federal level. That can complicate enforcement and create uneven standards across jurisdictions.
  • Communities near recycling and processing facilities Residents living near facilities handling recovered materials may fear that lighter regulation could increase odors, spills, truck traffic, or other local impacts. They may want stronger safeguards before materials are exempted from waste rules.
  • “solid waste shall not include certain recovered materials and recovered resources”

    This is the core legal change. Materials that are being recovered for reuse or further processing would be treated differently from ordinary waste, which can reduce regulatory obligations for businesses handling them.

  • “amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act”

    The bill changes federal environmental law rather than creating a new program. That means the effect would come through revised definitions and compliance rules, not through grants or direct spending.

  • “for other purposes”

    This signals that the measure may also include related technical or conforming changes. In practice, those changes often help align federal definitions with recycling and reuse operations.

June 11, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Take Action

Get more from BillBoard

Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.

Ask AI about this bill

Data sourced from api.congress.gov.

Free to use · No credit card

Understand every bill.
Make your voice count.

BillBoard turns dense U.S. legislation into plain-English summaries, helps you take a stance, and connects you to your representatives — in seconds.