Get started free →
HR 9275 119th Congress · House

Bill to Regulate Buy Now, Pay Later Like Credit Cards

Advocate

Official title: To amend the Truth in Lending Act to include buy now, pay later loans and issuers of such loans in the definition of credit card and credit issuer, respectively, and for other purposes.

This bill would amend the Truth in Lending Act so that buy now, pay later loans are treated more like credit cards under federal consumer credit law, and the companies that issue them are treated as credit issuers. That would bring BNPL products under a familiar lending framework for disclosures, billing practices, and consumer protections. The practical effect would be to extend federal oversight to a fast-growing form of short-term financing used by shoppers at checkout. It would mainly affect consumers who use BNPL services and the fintech firms and merchants that offer them.

  • Treats buy now, pay later loans as credit cards under the Truth in Lending Act.
  • Treats BNPL issuers as credit issuers for federal consumer-credit purposes.
  • Would extend credit-card-style disclosure and oversight rules to installment checkout loans.
  • Affects consumers who use BNPL and the companies that offer it at retail checkout.
Public Relevance 24 / 100
Niche Modest scope Broad

If you use buy now, pay later services, this bill would likely mean clearer disclosures and more standardized consumer protections when you split purchases into installments. It could also lead BNPL providers to tighten approval standards or change fees and repayment terms, which may make some offers less flexible but easier to compare with credit cards. If you do not use BNPL, the direct effect on you would be limited.

See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysis
FOR
  • Consumers who use installment payment apps They want clearer terms, easier comparison shopping, and stronger protections if a payment plan has fees, disputes, or refund problems. Treating BNPL more like credit cards could make the true cost and repayment obligations easier to understand.
  • Consumer protection advocates They argue BNPL has grown into a mainstream credit product without the same level of federal guardrails as traditional lending. Bringing it under the Truth in Lending Act would help prevent confusing marketing and inconsistent treatment across providers.
  • Traditional lenders and card issuers They may favor a more even regulatory playing field if BNPL products are competing directly with credit cards. Similar rules can reduce the advantage of products that operate with lighter oversight.
AGAINST
  • BNPL fintech companies They may argue that credit-card rules are a poor fit for short-term installment products and could impose compliance costs designed for a different kind of lending. They may also worry that stricter rules would slow checkout, reduce conversion, or limit product innovation.
  • Retailers that rely on BNPL for sales Merchants may fear that added friction or tighter underwriting could reduce the number of customers who qualify or complete purchases. If BNPL becomes less seamless, some retailers could see lower sales at checkout.
  • Some price-sensitive consumers Users who like BNPL for its speed and low upfront cost may dislike extra verification, disclosures, or restrictions. They could see fewer instant approvals or fewer promotional offers if providers adjust to the new rules.
  • “include buy now, pay later loans ... in the definition of credit card”

    This would move BNPL products into a legal category that already carries established disclosure and consumer-protection rules. For users, that can mean more standardized information about costs and repayment obligations.

  • “issuers of such loans in the definition of ... credit issuer”

    Companies that provide BNPL financing would be treated more like traditional lenders under federal law. That can expand oversight of how they market, service, and collect on installment loans.

  • “amend the Truth in Lending Act”

    The Truth in Lending Act is the main federal law requiring clear disclosure of credit terms. Extending it to BNPL would make the terms of these plans more comparable to other forms of consumer credit.

  • “and for other purposes”

    This phrase often signals that the bill may include related technical or conforming changes beyond the headline amendment. In practice, that can affect how the new definitions fit into existing consumer-credit rules.

June 11, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Take Action

Get more from BillBoard

Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.

Ask AI about this bill

Data sourced from api.congress.gov.

Free to use · No credit card

Understand every bill.
Make your voice count.

BillBoard turns dense U.S. legislation into plain-English summaries, helps you take a stance, and connects you to your representatives — in seconds.