Get started free →
HR 9171 119th Congress · House

House Interior & Environment Spending Bill Sets 2027 Agency Budgets

Advocate

Official title: Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027

This appropriations bill funds the Department of the Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency-related accounts, and several related conservation programs for fiscal year 2027. It provides specific dollar amounts for agencies and programs such as the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, endangered species work, wildlife refuges, wetlands conservation, and state and tribal wildlife grants. The bill also sets rules for how some of those funds can be used, including limits on certain administrative expenses and special carve-outs for maintenance, wild horse and burro management, and permitting work. Because it is an appropriations measure, it mainly affects how much money federal land, wildlife, and environmental programs can spend and on what.

  • BLM land management is funded at $1,212,095,000 for fiscal year 2027.
  • $144,000,000 is reserved for the BLM wild horse and burro program.
  • Fish and Wildlife Service operations receive $1,362,899,000.
  • State and Tribal Wildlife Grants are funded at $75,000,000.
  • The bill provides $52,000,000 for the North American Wetlands Conservation Fund.
Public Relevance 60 / 100
Niche Broad impact Broad

For the general public, this bill would mainly affect how federal land, wildlife, and conservation programs are staffed and operated in fiscal year 2027. People who use public lands, apply for permits, work in wildlife conservation, or rely on state and tribal wildlife grants could see changes tied to the bill’s funding levels, such as $1.212 billion for BLM management and $1.363 billion for Fish and Wildlife Service operations. It does not directly change taxes or benefits for most individuals, but it can influence access to public lands, species protection, and the pace of federal permitting and maintenance work.

See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysis
FOR
  • Public lands users and local western communities They may support the bill because it funds BLM land management, maintenance, and permit processing, which can help keep trails, facilities, grazing administration, and access-related functions operating. The $1,212,095,000 BLM account and related maintenance funding can support day-to-day management of large federal land holdings.
  • Wildlife conservation groups and habitat managers They may favor the bill because it provides dedicated money for endangered species work, refuges, wetlands, migratory birds, and state and tribal wildlife grants. The funding for the Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund, refuge operations, and habitat programs can support species recovery and habitat restoration.
  • States and tribal wildlife agencies They may back the bill because it includes $75,000,000 for State and Tribal Wildlife Grants. Those grants help finance local wildlife conservation plans and habitat work that states and tribes often cannot fully cover on their own.
AGAINST
  • Fiscal conservatives They may object to the bill because it commits large sums to federal land and wildlife programs, including more than $1.2 billion for BLM and more than $1.3 billion for Fish and Wildlife Service operations. They may argue that Congress should restrain spending or reduce federal program growth.
  • Some mining, energy, and development interests They may be concerned that the bill’s funding for endangered species implementation and habitat programs could support stricter federal oversight or slower project approvals. Even though the bill funds permit processing, the ESA-related caps and conservation spending may still be viewed as adding regulatory pressure.
  • Some public lands permit holders and ranchers They may worry that the bill’s detailed restrictions and earmarks could leave agencies with less flexibility to address local land-management needs. They may also object to funding levels or priorities that they believe favor conservation or enforcement over multiple-use access.
  • “$1,212,095,000, to remain available until September 30, 2028”

    This is the core BLM operating budget for the year, and it stays available into the next fiscal year. That gives the agency multi-year spending flexibility for land management, maintenance, and related operations.

  • “$144,000,000 for the wild horse and burro program”

    This sets a very large dedicated amount for managing wild horses and burros on public lands. It matters for roundup, care, adoption, and population-control efforts that affect land use and animal welfare debates.

  • “not to exceed $7,352,000 shall be used for implementing subsections (a), (b), (c), and (e) of section 4”

    The bill caps how much the Fish and Wildlife Service can spend on certain Endangered Species Act listing and related activities. That can limit how quickly the agency can process species decisions and habitat actions.

  • “$75,000,000, to remain available until expended”

    This is the funding level for State and Tribal Wildlife Grants, and the money does not expire at the end of the fiscal year. States, tribes, and territories can use it for wildlife and habitat programs over a longer period.

  • “$52,000,000 ... North American Wetlands Conservation Act”

    This supports wetland conservation projects that often involve partnerships with states, landowners, and conservation groups. It can affect habitat restoration, waterfowl conservation, and related land management projects.

June 5, 2026

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 599.

Take Action

Get more from BillBoard

Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.

Ask AI about this bill

Data sourced from api.congress.gov.

Free to use · No credit card

Understand every bill.
Make your voice count.

BillBoard turns dense U.S. legislation into plain-English summaries, helps you take a stance, and connects you to your representatives — in seconds.