What This Bill Does
The Advancing American Wi‑Fi Against Foreign Adversaries Act would direct the Secretary of Commerce, through the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, to produce a public plan for how the United States will promote Wi‑Fi and other unlicensed technologies worldwide. The plan must be developed within 180 days, include public comment, and cover efforts to advance global adoption of unlicensed spectrum, including support for harmonizing the 5925 MHz to 7125 MHz band for Wi‑Fi use. It also requires a post-conference report within 90 days after the 2027 World Radiocommunication Conference in Shanghai. The bill is aimed at federal agencies, international spectrum negotiations, and industries and consumers that rely on Wi‑Fi.
- Requires a Commerce Department plan within 180 days of enactment.
- Plan must be made public on the NTIA website.
- Focuses on global adoption of Wi‑Fi and unlicensed spectrum, including WRC‑27.
- Calls for support of harmonizing the 5925 MHz to 7125 MHz band for Wi‑Fi use.
- Requires a report within 90 days after WRC‑27 ends, with an unclassified version and possible classified annex.
Who This Bill Affects
For the general public, this bill would not directly change taxes, benefits, or eligibility rules. Its effect would be indirect: it could shape whether Wi‑Fi spectrum policy abroad stays favorable to U.S. consumers, businesses, schools, hospitals, and public-safety users that depend on unlicensed wireless networks. If the plan leads to stronger international support for the 5925 MHz to 7125 MHz band and other unlicensed uses, Americans could see better device interoperability and continued Wi‑Fi innovation over time.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Wi‑Fi equipment makers and wireless technology firms They would argue the bill helps defend spectrum rules that support innovation, device compatibility, and global markets for U.S.-developed wireless technologies. A coordinated federal plan could strengthen U.S. bargaining power in international negotiations.
- Businesses and institutions that rely on unlicensed wireless networks Schools, hospitals, offices, and public-safety users depend on Wi‑Fi for everyday connectivity. Supporters would say the bill helps preserve spectrum access that keeps these networks affordable and widely usable.
- National security and trade policy advocates They would view the bill as a way to counter foreign efforts to shape spectrum policy in ways that could favor untrusted infrastructure. The required interagency coordination and WRC‑27 planning could improve U.S. readiness.
- Countries and firms favoring alternative spectrum allocations They may argue the bill pushes the U.S. to lock in a preferred spectrum outcome before international negotiations are complete. That could be seen as limiting flexibility in how spectrum is allocated globally.
- Telecommunications stakeholders that prefer licensed-spectrum expansion Some industry players may worry that prioritizing unlicensed bands could constrain future licensed uses or complicate broader spectrum planning. They may prefer a more balanced approach across competing wireless needs.
- Critics of added federal planning requirements They may see the bill as another reporting mandate that produces strategy documents without guaranteeing concrete results. From that view, the main effect is administrative rather than operational.
Key Implications
-
““develop, submit … and make publicly available … a plan””
This creates a formal federal planning requirement and public transparency obligation. The plan is not just internal guidance; it must be shared publicly and sent to Congress.
-
““promoting global harmonization of the band … from 5925 megahertz to 7125 megahertz””
The bill singles out a specific spectrum range that is important for Wi‑Fi and other unlicensed uses. Harmonization can make devices work more consistently across countries and support larger equipment markets.
-
““seek public comment in developing the Plan””
The public, industry, and technical experts would have a chance to weigh in before the plan is finalized. That can broaden input, but it can also slow the process.
-
““assessment of, and strategies to counter, efforts by the Chinese Communist Party””
The plan must explicitly address perceived foreign efforts to influence spectrum policy. That means the document is meant to be both technical and geopolitical.
-
““report describing the implementation of the Plan””
After WRC‑27, Congress would get a follow-up on what was actually done. The report is meant to show whether the strategy was carried out and, where possible, how progress is being tracked.
Latest Status
June 4, 2026
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.