What This Bill Does
This bill would prohibit foreign nationals from entering into or enforcing surrogacy contracts in the United States. In practical terms, it targets cross-border surrogacy arrangements and would limit legal remedies for foreign intended parents who try to use U.S. surrogacy services. The measure is aimed at the contract side of surrogacy, which means it could affect fertility clinics, surrogacy agencies, intended parents, and gestational carriers involved in these arrangements. It was introduced in the House and referred to the House Judiciary Committee.
- Bars foreign nationals from entering surrogacy contracts in the United States
- Prohibits foreign nationals from enforcing those contracts in U.S. courts
- Targets cross-border surrogacy arrangements involving U.S. clinics and agencies
- Was referred to the House Judiciary Committee after introduction
Who This Bill Affects
For people in the general public, this bill would mainly matter if they are considering surrogacy, work in fertility services, or are involved in cross-border family planning. Foreign nationals would be barred from using U.S. surrogacy contracts or trying to enforce them in U.S. courts, which could reduce access to American surrogacy providers and change the legal risks for clinics, agencies, and surrogate mothers. Domestic intended parents would be less directly affected, but the bill could still influence market prices and availability if international demand falls.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Family-law reform advocates They argue the bill prevents complex international disputes over parentage, custody, and contract enforcement. In their view, limiting foreign participation reduces the risk that U.S. surrogates and children become entangled in cross-border legal conflicts.
- Reproductive ethics advocates They contend that commercial surrogacy can exploit vulnerable women and turn childbirth into a market transaction. Restricting foreign nationals, they say, helps curb a global surrogacy market that can be difficult to regulate and police.
- Immigration restriction supporters They may see the bill as a way to prevent the U.S. from serving as a hub for international reproductive services. The argument is that American legal institutions should not be used to facilitate arrangements for noncitizens that may later create immigration or citizenship complications.
- Fertility clinics and surrogacy agencies They may argue the bill would shrink a legitimate medical and family-building market and reduce business for providers that serve international clients. They also may warn that it would push surrogacy demand into less regulated settings abroad.
- Intended parents seeking surrogacy Foreign nationals and their families could argue the bill unfairly blocks them from forming families through lawful U.S. services. They may say nationality should not determine access to reproductive contracts or legal enforcement.
- Surrogates and reproductive-rights advocates They may argue that the bill limits the choices of adult surrogates who voluntarily enter these agreements. From this perspective, the law would restrict private contracts and could reduce opportunities for women who choose compensated surrogacy.
Key Implications
-
““prohibit foreign nationals from entering into or enforcing surrogacy contracts””
This would make nationality a legal barrier to using U.S. surrogacy agreements. Foreign intended parents could be blocked from signing enforceable contracts or from going to court to enforce them if disputes arise.
-
““in the United States””
The restriction would apply to arrangements tied to U.S. jurisdiction, which is where many fertility clinics, agencies, and legal services operate. That could reduce international surrogacy business conducted through American providers.
-
““and for other purposes””
This phrase often signals that the bill may include related legal or administrative changes beyond the headline restriction. In practice, that can affect how courts, agencies, or contracts are treated under the broader statutory framework.
-
““Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary””
The bill is in the committee stage, where members can hold hearings, revise the language, or leave it unchanged. That is the first major step before any House floor consideration.
Latest Status
June 3, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.