Get started free →
HR 9117 119th Congress · House

Bill to Expand Access to Health Care Information

Advocate

Official title: To promote the availability of ceratin health care information, and for other purposes.

This House bill would promote the availability of certain health care information, likely by requiring clearer disclosure, easier access, or broader sharing of health-related data with patients, families, and other authorized users. It has been introduced and sent to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, with additional referral to the Education and Workforce and Ways and Means Committees for provisions within their jurisdictions. The measure appears aimed at improving how health care information is distributed across the health system, which could affect providers, insurers, employers, schools, and patients who rely on timely information to make coverage and treatment decisions.

  • Promotes the availability of certain health care information.
  • Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  • Also referred to Education and Workforce and Ways and Means.
  • Introduced in the House on June 3, 2026.
  • No cosponsors are listed.
Public Relevance 60 / 100
Niche Broad impact Broad

For the general public, this bill could make health care information easier to obtain and use, which may help people compare options, understand coverage, and coordinate care. If it requires providers or plans to disclose more information, patients could see better transparency, but organizations handling that information may face new administrative steps.

See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysis
FOR
  • Patients and caregivers They generally want clearer, faster access to health care information so they can understand treatment options, compare services, and manage care for themselves or family members. Better information can reduce confusion and help people make more informed decisions.
  • Health policy transparency advocates They argue that health systems work better when information is easier to find and use. Standardized access can improve accountability and reduce the friction that keeps people from using the care or benefits they are entitled to.
  • Employers and benefits administrators Some may support clearer information rules if they reduce disputes and make it easier for workers to understand coverage, eligibility, and plan rules. Better information can also lower administrative confusion over time.
AGAINST
  • Hospitals and provider organizations They may worry about added reporting, disclosure, or systems-upgrade burdens. If the bill requires new workflows or standardized data sharing, providers could face compliance costs and operational complexity.
  • Health insurers and plan administrators They may object if the bill expands mandatory disclosures or creates new administrative requirements for benefit information. Insurers often resist rules that require major changes to data systems or customer communications.
  • Privacy advocates They may be concerned that broader availability of health information could increase the risk of unauthorized disclosure or misuse. Even well-intended transparency rules can create privacy and security challenges if safeguards are not strong enough.
  • “promote the availability of ceratin health care information”

    This signals a transparency-focused bill intended to make health-related information easier to access or distribute. In practice, that can affect how patients receive records, coverage details, or other care-related disclosures.

  • “Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce”

    This places the bill in the main House committee that handles health policy, consumer protection, and many parts of the health care system. Referral is the first step before hearings, amendments, or a committee vote.

  • “in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means”

    The bill may touch employer benefits, education-related health programs, or tax/benefit administration. Multiple referrals often mean the proposal reaches across several policy areas and could affect more than one type of institution.

  • “for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker”

    This means the Speaker controls how long each committee may review the bill. That can shape how quickly the measure moves and how much time committees have to examine its provisions.

June 3, 2026

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Take Action

Get more from BillBoard

Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.

Ask AI about this bill

Data sourced from api.congress.gov.

Free to use · No credit card

Understand every bill.
Make your voice count.

BillBoard turns dense U.S. legislation into plain-English summaries, helps you take a stance, and connects you to your representatives — in seconds.