What This Bill Does
This bill would create a grant program under the Public Health Service Act to help eligible federally assisted multifamily housing properties improve access to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and CPR training. The goal is to make it easier for residents, staff, and visitors in apartment-style housing to respond quickly to sudden cardiac emergencies. It would primarily affect owners, managers, and residents of federally assisted multifamily housing, along with local organizations that could help deliver training and equipment. The bill’s mechanism is a federal grant program rather than a direct mandate, so participation would depend on eligibility and funding awards.
- Creates a federal grant program under the Public Health Service Act
- Targets eligible federally assisted multifamily housing
- Supports access to automated external defibrillators (AEDs)
- Promotes cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and readiness
- Uses grants rather than a direct federal mandate
Who This Bill Affects
For residents of federally assisted multifamily housing, this bill could improve access to AEDs and CPR training in their buildings, which may increase the chance of surviving a sudden cardiac emergency. For housing providers, it could open a federal funding stream to offset the cost of equipment, training, and ongoing maintenance if they qualify for grants. If you live in or manage subsidized apartment housing, the main practical change would be the possibility of more emergency response resources on-site.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Public health advocates They argue that cardiac arrest is a race against time and that putting AEDs and CPR training closer to where people live can save lives. Grants can help close gaps in emergency preparedness in housing communities that may not otherwise afford the equipment.
- Affordable housing operators They may support the bill because it offers federal help to improve resident safety without forcing property owners to absorb the full cost. A grant program can make it easier to install equipment and train staff in a way that is financially manageable.
- Senior housing residents and families They may see value in having life-saving equipment and trained people nearby, especially in buildings with older adults or medically vulnerable residents. Faster response can matter more in dense housing where emergency services may take several minutes to arrive.
- Fiscal conservatives They may object to creating a new federal grant program and prefer that housing owners, insurers, or local governments handle emergency preparedness. Their concern is that federal spending could expand without clear evidence of cost-effectiveness across all eligible properties.
- Small housing providers Some may worry that even with grants, the program could create ongoing obligations for maintenance, inspections, and training. They may also fear administrative complexity in applying for and complying with grant requirements.
- Budget watchdogs They may question whether the program duplicates existing public-health or emergency-response initiatives. Their concern is that scattered grant programs can be harder to oversee and may not produce consistent results across properties.
Key Implications
-
““establish a grant program””
This means the bill would create a federal funding stream rather than directly ordering every housing property to buy equipment. Real-world access would depend on which properties apply and receive awards.
-
““promote access to automated external defibrillators””
AEDs are portable devices used to restore a normal heart rhythm during cardiac arrest. In housing settings, this could shorten the time between collapse and treatment, which is often critical for survival.
-
““and cardiopulmonary resuscitation””
The bill is not just about equipment; it also emphasizes CPR readiness. That suggests training residents or staff so someone on-site can begin lifesaving action before paramedics arrive.
-
““eligible federally assisted multifamily housing””
The program would focus on subsidized apartment-style housing rather than all homes or all rental properties. That narrows the reach to communities already connected to federal housing assistance.
-
““and for other purposes””
This standard legislative phrase signals that the bill may include related administrative or technical provisions beyond the main grant program. In practice, that can give agencies flexibility in how they implement the new policy.
Latest Status
May 29, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.