What This Bill Does
The Small Business Lending Fraud Prevention Act would require certain Small Business Administration employees to sign a written conflict-of-interest certification before they personally and substantially take part in the origination, review, or approval of an SBA-administered loan. It applies to employees involved in loans and requires them to say they have no prohibited conflicts under 18 U.S.C. § 208 or 5 C.F.R. § 2635.502, and to promise immediate disclosure and recusal if a conflict later arises. The bill also directs the SBA Administrator to issue implementing regulations within 180 days of enactment, and the certification rule would start 270 days after enactment.
- Applies to SBA employees who personally and substantially participate in loan origination, review, or approval.
- Requires a written certification before participating in an SBA-administered loan.
- Covers conflicts prohibited under 18 U.S.C. § 208 and 5 C.F.R. § 2635.502.
- If a conflict is discovered later, the employee must disclose it immediately and recuse.
- SBA Administrator must issue implementing regulations within 180 days of enactment; rule takes effect 270 days after enactment.
Who This Bill Affects
If you are a small business owner seeking an SBA loan, this bill could make the process a bit more trustworthy by requiring involved SBA employees to certify they have no prohibited conflicts of interest and to recuse themselves if a conflict appears later. The main effect is not financial—there is no new fee, loan limit, or grant amount—but a process change that could slightly slow or formalize loan handling while the SBA writes regulations and trains staff. For the general public, the effect is mainly that SBA lending decisions would be subject to a stricter ethics certification step for the employees handling them.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisOfficial Source & Bill Facts
BillBoard checks this page against public Congress.gov metadata, then adds plain-English analysis where available.
- Bill
- HR 7401
- Congress
- 119th Congress
- Official title
- Small Business Lending Fraud Prevention Act
- Policy area
- Economy & Finance
- Latest action
- At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Williams (TX) objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn. (June 23, 2026)
- Last updated
- June 24, 2026
CBO Cost Estimate
April 14, 2026As reported by the House Committee on Small Business on February 20, 2026
Full CBO report →Who Supports & Opposes This
- Small business borrowers They may want stronger assurances that SBA loan decisions are being made by employees without prohibited conflicts. A written certification and mandatory recusal can make the process feel more fair and reduce concerns about favoritism.
- Government ethics advocates They would see the bill as reinforcing existing conflict-of-interest rules with a specific pre-participation certification. That can improve compliance because employees must affirm their obligations before handling a loan.
- Responsible lenders and loan program managers Clear certification rules can reduce reputational risk and help standardize how conflicts are handled across the agency. The written process may also make enforcement easier if a problem arises later.
- SBA loan processing staff They may worry the new certification step adds paperwork and could slow loan processing, especially if employees must stop work to review conflicts or wait for new regulations and training.
- Small business advocates focused on speed of access to capital Even modest additional compliance steps can create friction in an already time-sensitive lending process. If implementation is cumbersome, borrowers could face delays in getting reviewed or approved.
- Agency administrators They may be concerned about the operational burden of designing forms, training staff, and issuing regulations within 180 days. The bill adds another compliance layer on top of existing ethics rules.
Key Implications
-
““certify to the Administrator in writing””
This creates a formal, documented step before an employee can participate in a loan. In practice, it gives the agency a paper trail that can be checked if a conflict-of-interest issue later comes up.
-
““personally and substantially participate in the origination, review, or approval””
The rule is aimed at employees who actually influence loan decisions, not every SBA worker. That narrows the bill to the people most likely to affect whether a borrower gets approved.
-
““does not have any conflict of interest prohibited under section 208 of title 18””
This ties the bill to existing federal criminal conflict-of-interest law. It means the bill reinforces current ethics obligations rather than creating a completely new standard from scratch.
-
““will immediately disclose such conflict of interest ... and recuse themselves””
If a conflict emerges after the certification, the employee cannot keep participating. That is meant to reduce the chance that a loan decision is tainted after the fact.
-
““issue regulations implementing this Act””
The SBA must translate the statutory rule into working procedures. The details of those regulations will matter for how burdensome the certification process is in real loan offices.
Latest Status
June 23, 2026
At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Williams (TX) objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.
Related Bills
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.