What This Bill Does
The Critical Minerals Supply Chain Resiliency Act of 2026 would change how certain Defense Department actions under Presidential Determination 2022-11 are treated for federal permitting purposes. It would automatically classify those actions as “covered projects” under the FAST-41 permitting framework and place them on the Permitting Dashboard, unless the project sponsor asks not to be included. The bill applies to projects aimed at creating, maintaining, protecting, expanding, or restoring domestic production of strategic and critical materials, including feasibility studies, by-product recovery, modernization, and other Defense Production Act activities. In practice, it is designed to speed up federal review and coordination for a specific set of mineral-supply-chain projects.
- Treats certain Defense Department actions under Presidential Determination 2022-11 as FAST-41 “covered projects.”
- Requires those actions to be included on the Permitting Dashboard under section 41003(b).
- Covers feasibility studies, by-product and co-product production, and modernization of mining and processing projects.
- Applies to actions to create, maintain, protect, expand, or restore domestic production of strategic and critical materials.
- Lets the project sponsor opt out of covered-project treatment and dashboard inclusion.
Who This Bill Affects
For the general public, the bill would mainly affect people and businesses connected to domestic mining, mineral processing, and related industrial facilities. If a project falls under Presidential Determination 2022-11, it could move into the FAST-41 permitting system and onto the Permitting Dashboard, which may speed coordination among federal agencies and make the review process more transparent. People living near affected sites could see projects advance more quickly, but the bill does not itself authorize new spending or guarantee any specific project will be approved.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Domestic mining and mineral-processing companies Supporters would say the bill reduces permitting delays for projects that expand U.S. production of strategic and critical materials. Faster, more coordinated review can lower financing risk and help projects reach construction or expansion sooner.
- National security and defense supply-chain advocates They would argue that domestic access to critical minerals is a security issue, and that the FAST-41 process can help ensure important projects are tracked and coordinated across agencies. The bill aligns permitting policy with the Defense Production Act purpose of strengthening supply chains.
- Workers and communities tied to industrial redevelopment Backers may see value in the bill’s coverage of mine-waste reclamation, beneficiation, and modernization, because those activities can support jobs and improve workforce safety and environmental performance at existing facilities.
- Environmental and conservation advocates They may worry that automatically treating these actions as covered projects could accelerate approvals for mining-related activity before full local and environmental concerns are resolved. The concern is not the dashboard itself, but the pressure to move projects faster.
- Local residents near proposed mining or processing sites Nearby communities may fear more industrial activity, traffic, water use, or land disturbance if projects are advanced more quickly through federal permitting. They may also be concerned that the bill favors project speed over community input.
- Agencies and permitting watchdogs Some may argue that expanding FAST-41 treatment to this category could add workload or reduce flexibility in how agencies manage reviews. Even with the opt-out provision, the bill could increase coordination demands for federal staff.
Key Implications
-
““treated as a covered project””
This means the listed actions would enter the FAST-41 permitting framework, which is designed to coordinate federal reviews and track milestones. For project sponsors, that can mean more structured and potentially faster permitting; for others, it can mean a more formalized federal process.
-
““included in the Permitting Dashboard””
Dashboard inclusion makes the project more visible to agencies and the public. That can improve transparency and accountability, but it can also signal that the project is being advanced through a priority permitting track.
-
““supporting feasibility studies for mature mining””
The bill covers early-stage studies, not just construction or extraction. That matters because feasibility work can determine whether a project moves forward at all, so permitting treatment at this stage can influence investment decisions.
-
““by-product and co-product production at existing mining””
The bill is not limited to new mines; it also reaches efforts to recover additional minerals from existing operations and industrial facilities. That could broaden domestic supply without requiring entirely new sites, though it still involves federal review.
-
““the project sponsor… requests that the action not be treated””
Sponsors can opt out of covered-project status and dashboard inclusion. This gives companies or agencies flexibility if they prefer not to use the FAST-41 process or do not want the project publicly tracked in that system.
Latest Status
June 9, 2026
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 602.
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.