What This Bill Does
H.R. 3497, the Medal of Sacrifice Act of 2025, directs the President to create and issue a new medal for law enforcement officers and first responders who are killed in the line of duty. It covers local, State, Tribal, territorial, and Federal officers and responders, but excludes cases with an official finding of wrongdoing. The bill also creates a 12-member presidential commission to advise on the medal’s design, presentation, and eligibility rules, and it names three deputies to receive the medal initially: Ralph "Butch" Waller, Ignacio "Dan" Diaz, and Luis Paez.
- Creates a federal "medal of sacrifice" for law enforcement officers and first responders killed in the line of duty.
- Covers local, State, Tribal, territorial, and Federal officers and responders.
- Excludes cases with an "official finding of wrongdoing" by the employing agency or superior officer.
- Requires the President to appoint 12 commission members within 150 days of enactment.
- Names three deputies to receive the medal initially: Ralph "Butch" Waller, Ignacio "Dan" Diaz, and Luis Paez.
Who This Bill Affects
For the general public, this bill has little direct financial effect because it does not authorize spending benefits or change taxes. Its practical effect is on the families, agencies, and communities of fallen law enforcement officers and first responders, who may receive a new federal medal and a formal eligibility process for honoring line-of-duty deaths. The bill also affects the three named deputies, who are specifically awarded the medal in the text.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Families of fallen officers and first responders They are likely to support the bill because it creates a formal national honor for loved ones killed in the line of duty. The medal and engraved reverse side provide a lasting recognition of sacrifice that can be presented and preserved by families.
- Law enforcement and first responder communities They may view the medal as an important symbol of public service and sacrifice across multiple levels of government. The bill also gives those communities a role in the commission that advises on design, presentation, and eligibility.
- Public-safety advocates and local agencies They may support a uniform federal recognition standard because it can help honor deaths consistently across jurisdictions. The commission process also allows agency findings to be considered in difficult eligibility cases.
- Civil liberties and police accountability advocates They may worry that a federal medal for line-of-duty deaths could be controversial in cases involving misconduct, especially because the bill still allows a commission review after an official finding of wrongdoing. Their concern is that symbolic honors could be seen as minimizing accountability.
- Taxpayers concerned about federal commemorative spending Although the bill does not create a large program, critics of commemorative legislation may object to federal resources being used for medal design, commission administration, and ceremonial recognition. They may argue that such honors should remain local or agency-based.
- People concerned about politicized eligibility decisions They may be uneasy that the commission must make final determinations in wrongdoing cases, which could lead to disputes over whether a death should be honored. That could create tension for families, agencies, and the public when the facts are contested.
Key Implications
-
“"The President shall issue a medal of sacrifice"”
This makes the award a federal honor, not just a private or agency-level tribute. Families and agencies would have a national symbol of recognition tied to line-of-duty deaths.
-
“"who were killed in the line of duty"”
Eligibility is limited to deaths connected to service, so the medal is not for general public service or retirement. It focuses the honor on the most serious sacrifice in public safety work.
-
“"official finding of wrongdoing"”
Deaths tied to misconduct are not automatically eligible. That creates a safeguard, but it also means some cases will require additional review before a medal can be awarded.
-
“"appoint 12 members ... not later than 150 days"”
The commission must be formed on a specific timeline, which pushes the executive branch to act quickly after enactment. The membership mix suggests the bill wants both professional and organizational input.
-
“"The Commission shall award ... Deputy Ralph 'Butch' Waller ... Ignacio 'Dan' Diaz ... Luis Paez"”
These individuals are singled out in the statute itself, so the bill does more than create a general honor. It guarantees initial recipients rather than leaving all awards to future discretion.
Latest Status
May 28, 2026
Became Public Law No: 119-94.
Became Law
100% — signed into law
The bill is enacted: the recent actions note that it became Public Law No. 119-94 on 2026-05-28. Its legislative context is therefore final passage rather than committee consideration or floor debate, and the text itself does not list co-sponsors or recorded party-line support/opposition. Measures that create honorary federal medals for specific public servants are typically low-cost and often pass as commemorative legislation, with the main substantive issue being the eligibility rules and the symbolic choices embedded in the award.
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.