What This Bill Does
H.R. 175, the "Deport Alien Gang Members Act," would expand immigration penalties for noncitizens tied to "criminal gangs." It would make certain people inadmissible to the United States and deportable if an immigration or law-enforcement official knows or has reason to believe they are, were, or assisted a gang member. The bill also creates a Homeland Security designation process for labeling a group a criminal gang, with notice to Congress, publication in the Federal Register, and periodic review. Its definition reaches groups of 5 or more people whose primary purpose includes a continuing series of specified crimes, including drug offenses, firearms offenses, crimes of violence, obstruction, trafficking, racketeering, money laundering, and stolen-vehicle offenses.
- Defines a "criminal gang" as a group of 5 or more people with a primary purpose of committing listed crimes.
- Makes an alien inadmissible if officials know or have reason to believe the person is or was a gang member.
- Makes an alien deportable for being a gang member or for promoting, conspiring with, aiding, or participating in gang activity.
- Requires 7 days' notice to congressional leaders and committees before a gang designation is made.
- Allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to use classified information in designations and revocations.
Who This Bill Affects
For the general public, this bill would mainly affect noncitizens accused of gang ties, not U.S. citizens directly. It could make it easier for immigration officials to deny entry or remove people based on gang membership or assistance, and it gives the Department of Homeland Security a formal process to designate groups as criminal gangs. People in communities with gang activity could see stronger immigration enforcement, while immigrants with disputed associations could face a higher risk of exclusion or deportation.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Border-security and immigration-enforcement advocates They would argue the bill gives immigration authorities clearer tools to block and remove noncitizens tied to organized criminal groups. The formal designation process and broad list of qualifying offenses are seen as necessary to respond to gangs that operate across borders and use violence, trafficking, and fraud.
- Victims of gang violence and affected local communities They may support stronger immigration consequences for people connected to gangs because they want faster removal of individuals who contribute to violence, drug trafficking, and intimidation. The bill is framed as a way to reduce the presence of people who facilitate organized crime.
- Law enforcement officials focused on transnational crime They may favor the ability to rely on a DHS designation and classified information when gang activity is hard to prove publicly. The bill’s structure is designed to make immigration action possible even when criminal networks are secretive or operate through proxies.
- Immigrant-rights advocates They are likely to argue that the bill uses a broad "knows, or has reason to believe" standard that could be applied too loosely, especially to people with family, neighborhood, or past associations rather than direct criminal conduct. They may also object to limiting the ability to challenge a designation in removal proceedings.
- Civil-liberties groups They may criticize the use of classified information and the restriction on contesting the validity of a designation, saying those features reduce transparency and due process. In their view, people could be removed based on secret evidence they cannot fully see or rebut.
- Defense attorneys and due-process advocates They may worry the definition of gang membership is expansive because it includes promotion, conspiracy, aid, participation, and entry in furtherance of gang activity. That breadth could capture people with indirect or disputed involvement and make immigration consequences easier to trigger.
Key Implications
-
“"Any alien is inadmissible who ... is, or has been, a member of a criminal gang"”
This means a noncitizen can be blocked from entering the United States if an official believes they are or were part of a qualifying gang. The standard is not limited to people with a criminal conviction.
-
“"has promoted, conspired with, aided, or participated in the activities of a criminal gang"”
This extends immigration penalties beyond formal membership to people who helped a gang in any of several ways. In practice, that could reach associates, facilitators, or people accused of indirect support.
-
“"7 days before making a designation ... notify" congressional leaders and committees”
The bill builds in a short congressional notice period before DHS can formally label a group a criminal gang. That creates some oversight, but it does not require congressional approval before the designation takes effect.
-
“"may consider classified information"”
DHS can rely on secret evidence when designating or reviewing a gang. That can help protect intelligence sources, but it also means affected people may not be able to see all of the evidence used against them.
-
“"shall not be permitted to raise any question concerning the validity" of the designation”
Once the designation is effective, a person in removal proceedings cannot attack the designation itself as a defense. That narrows the issues they can argue in immigration court and may make removal easier once a gang label is in place.
Latest Status
June 3, 2026
Ordered to be Reported Adversely (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 8.
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.