What This Bill Does
H. Con. Res. 107 is a nonbinding House concurrent resolution that says Congress should reaffirm a national commitment to saving lives, reducing gun violence, and strengthening public safety as the United States marks its 250th anniversary in 2026. It does not create a new program, set aside money, or change criminal law; instead, it expresses congressional support for a set of policy priorities. Those priorities include community violence intervention, federal background checks, better law-enforcement data collection, improved homicide and shooting clearance rates, de-escalation training, and stronger victim services. The resolution affects the national debate around gun violence and public safety, especially for survivors, communities facing violence, law enforcement, public health professionals, and advocates.
- Recognizes the United States’ 250th anniversary in 2026 as a moment to reaffirm a commitment to reducing gun violence.
- Calls for support for law enforcement data collection, publication of violent-crime data, and better clearance rates for homicides and shootings.
- Supports expanded community-based violence intervention using credible messengers and customized services.
- Commits to robust funding for victim services.
- Affirms that policies should strengthen public safety while upholding constitutional rights.
Who This Bill Affects
For the general public, this resolution would not directly change taxes, benefits, or criminal penalties, because it is a concurrent resolution and does not appropriate money or create enforceable rules. Its practical effect would be indirect: it could influence future House and Senate action on background checks, violence-intervention grants, victim services, police data systems, and de-escalation training. If later legislation follows this framework, communities affected by shootings and survivors of gun violence would be the most likely to feel the impact.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Survivors of gun violence and their families They may support the resolution because it formally recognizes their losses and calls for stronger victim services. The emphasis on prevention and recovery can be seen as validating the needs of people living with trauma after shootings.
- Public health professionals and violence-prevention practitioners They are likely to favor the resolution because it treats gun violence as preventable and endorses evidence-informed approaches such as community violence intervention. The text specifically highlights proactive strategies that address root causes before violence occurs.
- Law enforcement leaders focused on crime reduction They may support the resolution’s call for better violent-crime data, higher clearance rates for homicides and shootings, and de-escalation training. Those provisions align with efforts to improve investigations and reduce repeat violence.
- Gun rights advocates They may object to the resolution’s framing of gun violence and its endorsement of federal background checks and other public-safety policies. Even though it is nonbinding, they may view it as laying groundwork for future restrictions they believe could burden lawful gun ownership.
- Fiscal conservatives They may resist the resolution’s call for expanded investment and robust funding for victim services and community-based interventions. Their concern would be that the resolution points toward new federal spending without specifying offsets or limits.
- Critics of federal involvement in local policing They may argue that priorities like clearance rates, data publication, and de-escalation training should be left to states and localities. They could see the resolution as encouraging federal influence over policing practices that vary by community.
Key Implications
-
““collect and publish data about violent crimes””
This points to more emphasis on standardized crime reporting and transparency. In practice, that could help policymakers and the public compare violence trends and evaluate which interventions are working.
-
““improve clearance rates for homicides and shootings””
Clearance rates measure whether police solve cases. Raising them would matter for victims’ families and communities because it can affect accountability, deterrence, and trust in law enforcement.
-
““expand training in deescalation tactics””
This suggests more attention to reducing the chance that confrontations turn violent. For officers and the public, it could mean different training priorities in encounters where tensions are high.
-
““expanded investment in proactive, community-based strategies””
The resolution endorses prevention programs that intervene before violence happens. That could translate into future grants or appropriations for outreach workers, credible messengers, and local violence-interruption efforts.
-
““robust funding for victim services””
This signals support for counseling, assistance, and recovery services for people harmed by gun violence. The practical effect would depend on later appropriations, but the resolution makes those services a stated federal priority.
Latest Status
May 29, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.