Get started free →
HR 9185 119th Congress · House

NOAA Blue Whales and Blue Skies Program

Advocate

Official title: To direct the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to establish a Blue Whales and Blue Skies Program to reduce air pollution and harmful underwater acoustic impacts and the risk of fatal vessel whale strikes by recognizing voluntary reductions in the speed of vessels transiting the western coast of the United States, and for other purposes.

This bill would direct NOAA’s Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere to create a Blue Whales and Blue Skies Program aimed at cutting air pollution, reducing harmful underwater noise, and lowering the risk of deadly ship strikes on whales along the western coast of the United States. The program would recognize voluntary vessel speed reductions as a conservation and air-quality measure, giving ships an incentive to slow down in sensitive waters. It is designed to affect commercial shipping, port operations, coastal communities, and marine wildlife. The bill does not establish a direct spending amount in the title, but it creates a federal program framework that could shape how vessel operators are rewarded for slower transit speeds.

  • Directs NOAA to establish a Blue Whales and Blue Skies Program.
  • Recognizes voluntary vessel speed reductions on the western coast of the United States.
  • Targets three linked harms: air pollution, underwater noise, and whale strikes.
  • Focuses on ships transiting West Coast waters, especially major shipping lanes.
  • Creates a federal incentive framework rather than a direct speed mandate.
Public Relevance 28 / 100
Niche Modest scope Broad

If you live on or near the West Coast, this bill could improve local air quality and reduce the chance of whale strikes by encouraging slower vessel speeds in coastal shipping lanes. For people who work in shipping or port logistics, it could mean longer transit times and some operational adjustments, though the bill’s approach is voluntary rather than a direct mandate. For the general public, the main effect would be indirect: cleaner coastal air and better protection for marine wildlife.

See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysis
FOR
  • Marine conservation advocates They argue that slower vessel speeds are one of the most practical ways to reduce fatal whale strikes and underwater noise in busy shipping corridors. A federal program can make those voluntary efforts more visible and more likely to be adopted consistently.
  • Coastal public health advocates They see an opportunity to reduce pollution from large ships near shore, which can improve air quality for communities living close to ports and shipping routes. Even modest reductions can matter in neighborhoods already burdened by industrial emissions.
  • Some port and shipping operators Operators that already participate in voluntary speed-reduction efforts may support a formal NOAA program because it can recognize and standardize practices they are already using. A clear federal framework can also reduce uncertainty and help coordinate conservation efforts across ports.
AGAINST
  • Shipping companies focused on delivery speed They may argue that slower transit can raise operating costs, disrupt schedules, and reduce efficiency in supply chains. Even voluntary programs can create pressure to comply, especially if customers or regulators treat participation as an expectation.
  • Port-dependent businesses Businesses that rely on predictable cargo timing may worry that speed reductions could lengthen shipping windows and complicate inventory planning. They may prefer measures that do not affect transit time or logistics reliability.
  • Some labor and maritime stakeholders They may be concerned that any slowdown regime could be unevenly applied or could shift costs without clear compensation. Their concern is less about the conservation goal than about how incentives and operational burdens are distributed.
  • “establish a Blue Whales and Blue Skies Program”

    This creates a formal NOAA program rather than a one-time initiative. In practice, that means a continuing federal structure for recognizing and encouraging vessel practices that benefit marine life and air quality.

  • “reduce air pollution and harmful underwater acoustic impacts”

    The bill links vessel speed to both emissions and ocean noise. That matters because the same operational change can affect human health near ports and marine species in the water.

  • “reduce the risk of fatal vessel whale strikes”

    The program is aimed at one of the most direct threats to large whales in shipping lanes. Slower speeds can give whales more time to avoid ships and can reduce the severity of collisions.

  • “recognizing voluntary reductions in the speed of vessels”

    The approach is incentive-based rather than a hard speed limit. That means the bill is designed to encourage participation through recognition, not to impose an across-the-board mandate.

  • “transiting the western coast of the United States”

    The geographic focus is the West Coast, where major shipping routes overlap with whale habitat. The practical effects would be concentrated in coastal waters and port approaches rather than nationwide.

June 8, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Take Action

Get more from BillBoard

Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.

Ask AI about this bill

Data sourced from api.congress.gov.

Free to use · No credit card

Understand every bill.
Make your voice count.

BillBoard turns dense U.S. legislation into plain-English summaries, helps you take a stance, and connects you to your representatives — in seconds.