What This Bill Does
The Tax Clarity for Mining and Staking Act would amend the Internal Revenue Code to create specific tax rules for digital assets received through mining or staking. In general, it would require taxpayers to include the fair market value of newly minted digital assets in gross income when they acquire them, and it would let some taxpayers elect to defer that income and instead capitalize certain acquisition costs. The bill also sets special rules for partnerships, S corporations, foreign entities, and certain trusts that hold these assets. It is aimed mainly at people and businesses involved in validating digital asset transactions, including miners, stakers, and some investment-trust structures.
- Newly minted digital assets would be included in gross income as ordinary income when acquired, at fair market value.
- Taxpayers could elect to defer income on qualified newly minted digital assets under section 1400W-2.
- Specified acquisition costs are generally not capitalized unless Treasury allows an exception tied to financial-statement treatment.
- The election would apply at the partnership or S corporation level.
- The bill excludes controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies, and some foreign trusts from the election.
Who This Bill Affects
If you mine or stake digital assets, this bill would directly affect when you owe tax and how you calculate basis. By default, newly minted digital assets would be taxed as ordinary income when acquired, but eligible taxpayers could elect to defer that income and capitalize specified acquisition costs, which may help with timing but also adds recordkeeping and later tax consequences on sale. For people who do not participate in crypto validation activities, the bill would have little direct day-to-day effect.
See how this bill affects you — sign in for a personalized analysisWho Supports & Opposes This
- Crypto miners and stakers They may support the bill because it creates explicit tax rules for rewards received from validation activities. A clearer statutory framework can reduce uncertainty about when income is recognized and how basis is calculated.
- Digital asset businesses and tax preparers They may favor the bill because it gives Treasury authority to issue detailed rules for allocation, reporting, and elections. That can make compliance more standardized across taxpayers and platforms.
- Investment-trust sponsors and brokers They may welcome the provisions on widely traded fixed investment trusts because the bill contemplates reporting methods, basis allocation, and aggregation rules. Those rules could make trust-based crypto products easier to administer.
- Small miners and hobbyist stakers They may oppose the bill because the default rule taxes newly minted assets immediately at fair market value, even if the taxpayer has not sold them. That can create cash-flow problems and more complex recordkeeping.
- Tax practitioners and compliance-focused investors They may object to the added complexity of an election, special basis rules, and separate treatment for partnerships, S corporations, foreign entities, and trusts. The bill could increase filing burdens and make tax outcomes harder to predict.
- Crypto investors using trust structures They may be concerned that Treasury could impose additional reporting and basis-allocation rules for widely traded fixed investment trusts. Those requirements could reduce simplicity and increase administrative costs for holders.
Key Implications
-
““the fair market value of such asset shall be included in the taxpayer’s gross income as ordinary income””
This means mining or staking rewards would generally be taxed when received, not only when sold. For people who receive tokens but keep them, the tax bill could arrive before any cash is realized.
-
““all qualified newly minted digital assets… shall not be included in the taxpayer’s gross income””
This is the core of the optional deferral election. Eligible taxpayers could postpone income recognition on qualifying assets, but they would then face later gain recognition when the asset is disposed of.
-
““specified acquisition costs shall be treated as an expense which is not chargeable to capital account””
The bill generally prevents miners and stakers from adding certain acquisition costs to basis, unless Treasury creates a financial-statement-based exception. That affects how much taxable gain or deductible expense is recognized later.
-
““the election under this section shall be made at the partnership or S corporation level””
This pushes the choice up to the entity level rather than leaving each owner to decide separately. For pass-through businesses, that can simplify administration but also limits individual flexibility.
-
““the taxpayer indefinitely ceases all activities related to the validation of digital assets (including staking and mining)””
Treasury must write rules for taxpayers who stop mining or staking altogether. That suggests special treatment for leftover costs that were not allocated to qualifying assets before the activity ended.
Latest Status
June 8, 2026
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Take Action
Get more from BillBoard
Free tools to understand, respond to, and track this bill.
Ask AI about this billData sourced from api.congress.gov.